Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36206287›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Comparing machine learning algorithms for multimorbidity prediction: An example from the Elsa-Brasil study.

Daniela Polessa Paula, Odaleia Barbosa Aguiar, Larissa Pruner Marques, Isabela Bensenor, Claudia Kimie Suemoto, Maria de Jesus Mendes da Fonseca, Rosane Härter Griep

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniela Polessa PaulaNational School of Statistical Sciences, Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0576-7361
Odaleia Barbosa AguiarInstitute of Nutrition, University of the Rio de Janeiro State, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Larissa Pruner MarquesNational School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Isabela BensenorDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo & Hospital Universitário, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Claudia Kimie SuemotoDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria de Jesus Mendes da FonsecaDepartment of Epidemiology, National School of Public Health (ENSP/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rosane Härter GriepHealth and Environmental Education Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute (IOC), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6250-2036

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultimorbidity is a worldwide concern related to greater disability, worse quality of life, and mortality. The early prediction is crucial for preventive strategies design and integrative medical practice. However, knowledge about how to predict multimorbidity is limited, possibly due to the complexity involved in predicting multiple chronic diseases.

methodsIn this study, we present the use of a machine learning approach to build cost-effective multimorbidity prediction models. Based on predictors easily obtainable in clinical practice (sociodemographic, clinical, family disease history and lifestyle), we build and compared the performance of seven multilabel classifiers (multivariate random forest, and classifier chain, binary relevance and binary dependence, with random forest and support vector machine as base classifiers), using a sample of 15105 participants from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). We developed a web application for the building and use of prediction models.

resultsClassifier chain with random forest as base classifier performed better (accuracy = 0.34, subset accuracy = 0.15, and Hamming Loss = 0.16). For different feature sets, random forest based classifiers outperformed those based on support vector machine. BMI, blood pressure, sex, and age were the features most relevant to multimorbidity prediction.

conclusionsOur results support the choice of random forest based classifiers for multimorbidity prediction.

Indexed as

MultimorbidityQuality of LifeAdultAlgorithmsBrazilHumansLongitudinal StudiesMachine LearningSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID36206287
PMCPMC9543987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.