ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2022
Noninvasive electrophysiological differences between women and men: differences in body size not an explanation.
Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Delayed late ventricular depolarization is associated with inflammation in epicardial Fat Among females: a New avenue in cardiac electrophysiology.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Sex as a biological variable for cardiovascular physiology.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024Review
- Sex differences in cardiac electrophysiology: does body size matter?American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022Article
- QRS 3D voltage-time integral in narrow QRS complex - Establishing the normal reference range.Journal of electrocardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are numerous sex-related differences in cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmia propensity but very little knowledge about the reasons. Difference in body size has been proposed as one reason and was tested in this study of >20 cardiac electrophysiology parameters in 319 (158 women) apparently healthy 50- to 64-yr-old subjects from a randomly enrolled population sample, the pilot SCAPIS (Swedish Cardiopulmonary Bioimaging Study), using Frank vectorcardiography. We studied conventional conduction intervals, parameters reflecting electrical heterogeneity (dispersion) in the ventricles, QRS- and T-vector directions, spatial QRS-T angles, and T-vector loop morphology. Body surface area (BSA; 2 methods) and lean body mass (LBM), both estimated from body weight and height, were used as body size parameters. According to multivariable linear regression analysis adjusted for sex, there was no association between electrophysiological parameters and body size apart from QRS duration and QRSarea. In conclusion, most electrophysiological parameters assessed completely noninvasively and showing statistically significant differences between women and men on the group level show no association with BSA or LBM. Scaling (indexing) the electrophysiological parameters for body size parameters is therefore not an option. Consequently, the explanation for the sex-related electrophysiological differences should be sought along other lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.