Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36206037›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

Providing Accessible ReCreation Outdoors-User-Driven Research on Standards: Protocol for Mobile and Web-Based Interviews for Winter Assessments.

Mike Prescott, Stéphanie Gamache, W Ben Mortenson, Krista L Best, Marie Grandisson, Mir Abolfazl Mostafavi, Delphine Labbé, Ernesto Morales, Atiya Mahmood, Jaimie Borisoff and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mike PrescottCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7900-2575
Stéphanie GamacheCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8301-5176
W Ben MortensonDepartment of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0183-6163
Krista L BestCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7205-7725
Marie GrandissonCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5874-9039
Mir Abolfazl MostafaviCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3688-6638
Delphine LabbéDepartment of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3730-4310
Ernesto MoralesCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6488-5093
Atiya MahmoodDepartment of Gerontology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4986-0979
Jaimie BorisoffInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9672-8367
Bonita SawatzkyDepartment of Orthopedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8901-2301
William C MillerDepartment of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3060-0210
Laura Yvonne BulkDepartment of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0245-0991
Julie M RobillardDepartment of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5765-4927
François RouthierCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5458-6233
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CABritish Columbia Institute of Technology · CASimon Fraser University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough there have been recent efforts to improve access to Canadian national parks, many remain not fully accessible to people with disabilities. Winter conditions, in particular, present challenges that limit their participation in outdoor activities.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a novel method to assess park access during winter, which will inform recommendations for national park standards to meet the needs of all park visitors (regardless of ability) during winter conditions.

methodsA larger participatory mixed methods research project exploring park access was adapted. A 3-phase approach has already been proposed to achieve the study objectives. In the first phase, a scoping review of the existing accessibility standards will be conducted. In the second phase, objective audits of trails and features in 6 parks, 3 in western Canada and 3 in eastern Canada, will be conducted, as well as mobile interviews with 24 various participants in each region regarding their experiences of and recommendations for improving the park's accessibility. In the final phase, a Delphi participatory consensus development process will be used, based on the data gathered in the first 2 phases, to prioritize recommendations for standards. This paper will focus on the second phase of the study, specifically on whether the in-person winter mobile interviews (ie, walking and wheeling interviews) with people who have a wide range of disabilities while visiting 3 parks in 2 provinces were modified. Changes were made to accommodate the extreme winter weather conditions in Quebec while using safe and informative data collection methods.

resultsIn Quebec, one park, where winter conditions are safer, has been assessed in person (n=4). Web-based interviews were used to facilitate the assessment of other winter and summer conditions in two other parks (n=8). Winter and web-based interviews were completed in April 2022. Data are currently being collected and analyzed, and results will be completed by December 2022.

conclusionsWe expect that adapting the protocol to gather further information on winter conditions and access to parks will provide high-quality and rich data to better inform park access standards. This participatory mixed methods research will inform the development of park standards that consider the accessibility needs of all people. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/38715.

Indexed as

accessaccessibilityactivitybarriersCanadadatadevelopmentdisabilityinterviewmix-methodnational parknational parksoutdoorparksparticipationparticipatorysafestandardstandardssummeruser-oriented researchvirtualwinter

Identifiers

PMID36206037
PMCPMC9587487
OpenAlexW4283802165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.