Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36205836›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2022

Efficacy and safety in ketamine-guided prehospital analgesia for abdominal pain.

David Häske, Wolfgang Dorau, Niklas Heinemann, Fabian Eppler, Tobias Schopp, Benjamin Schempf

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David HäskeCenter for Public Health and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. haske@rettungsdienst-reutlingen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5190-3937
Wolfgang DorauEmergency Medical Service, German Red Cross, 72764, Reutlingen, Germany.
Niklas HeinemannEmergency Medical Service, German Red Cross, 72764, Reutlingen, Germany.
Fabian EpplerEmergency Medical Service, German Red Cross, 72764, Reutlingen, Germany.
Tobias SchoppEmergency Medical Service, German Red Cross, 72764, Reutlingen, Germany.
Benjamin SchempfEmergency Medical Service, German Red Cross, 72764, Reutlingen, Germany.
German Red Cross · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal pain is a common reason for presentation in the emergency department and for calling emergency medical services. The complexity of abdominal pain also influences the analgesia strategy. However, there are almost no data on the use of ketamine for abdominal pain. This study aims to analyze the safety and efficacy of using ketamine as an analgesic for abdominal pain. In a retrospective analysis of prehospital patient data within the framework of quality assurance, all cases with ketamine administered by paramedics as analgesia for abdominal pain were analyzed in terms of pain reduction and patient safety and also compared with other analgesic drugs including fentanyl, morphine, and metamizole. From 01/01/2018 to 11/24/2021, 129 datasets were analyzed. The mean patient age was 50 ± 19 years (19-90 years), with 47.3% (n = 61) women. The application of fentanyl was documented as a monotherapy in 10.9% (n = 14), morphine in 2.3% (n = 3), metamizole in 34.1% (n = 44), and ketamine in 52.7% (n = 68) of cases. The pain relief of fentanyl, metamizole, and ketamine differed significantly from each other (p < 0.001), with fentanyl and ketamine being comparable. Looking at the quality assurance definition of successful analgesia (pain on handover NRS < 5 or pain reduction ≥ 2 points), successful analgesia was shown in 92.9% (n = 13) of cases for fentanyl, in 65.9% (n = 44) for metamizole, and 92.6% (n = 68) for ketamine (p < 0.001). Adverse events were not observed in patients treated with ketamine. Analgesia is an important goal in the treatment of patients with abdominal pain. With ketamine, analgesia comparable to fentanyl can be achieved. Ketamine appears to be a safe and effective option for the treatment of patients with abdominal pain in emergency medicine.Trial registration number DRKS00027343, date of registration: 09.12.2021, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaEmergency Medical ServicesKetamineAbdominal PainAdultAgedAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidDipyroneFemaleFentanylHumansMiddle AgedMorphinePain MeasurementRetrospective StudiesAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidDipyroneFentanylKetamineMorphineEMSOut-of-hospitalSafetyTreatment

Identifiers

PMID36205836
OpenAlexW4303513142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.