Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36205818›Full record

ArticleSurgical case reports2022

Robot-assisted total pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a case report.

Kyoichi Kihara, Yuri Koyama, Takehiko Hanaki, Kozo Miyatani, Tomoyuki Matsunaga, Manabu Yamamoto, Shuichi Morizane, Naruo Tokuyasu, Teruhisa Sakamoto, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyoichi KiharaDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, 36-1 Nishimachi, Yonago City, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan. kyo1kihara@tottori-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7363-6136
Yuri KoyamaDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, 36-1 Nishimachi, Yonago City, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan.
Takehiko HanakiDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, 36-1 Nishimachi, Yonago City, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan.
Kozo MiyataniDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, 36-1 Nishimachi, Yonago City, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan.
Tomoyuki MatsunagaDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, 36-1 Nishimachi, Yonago City, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan.
Manabu YamamotoDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, 36-1 Nishimachi, Yonago City, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan.
Shuichi MorizaneDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, 36-1 Nishimachi, Yonago City, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan.
Naruo TokuyasuDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, 36-1 Nishimachi, Yonago City, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan.
Teruhisa SakamotoDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, 36-1 Nishimachi, Yonago City, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan.
Yoshiyuki FujiwaraDivision of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, 36-1 Nishimachi, Yonago City, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan.
Tottori University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are numerous indications for minimally invasive surgery. However, the laparoscopic approach for extended pelvic surgery is currently provided by only a few institutions specializing in cancer treatment, primarily because of technical difficulties that arise in cases involving a narrow pelvis and rigid forceps. We report a case of robot-assisted total pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer involving the prostate. We assessed the feasibility of robot-assisted total pelvic exenteration and compared the short-term outcomes of other conventional and minimally invasive approaches. CASE PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old man was referred to our hospital after positive fecal blood test results. The initial diagnosis was clinical T4bN2aM0, Stage IIIC rectal cancer involving the prostate. The patient underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Consequently, robot-assisted total pelvic exenteration with an ileal conduit and end colostomy creation were performed. The total operative duration was 9 h and 20 min. The durations of robot console usage by the colorectal and urological teams were 2 h 9 min and 2 h 23 min, respectively. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 21. The pathological diagnosis was T4b (prostate) N0M0, Stage IIC. The resection margin was 2.5 mm. During reassessment at 2 years after resection, no evidence of recurrence was observed.

conclusionsRobot-assisted total pelvic exenteration was performed for a patient with advanced rectal cancer without serious complications. Robot-assisted total pelvic exenteration may provide the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, particularly in the enclosed space of the pelvis.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyColorectal neoplasmsLaparoscopyPelvic exenterationsProstatectomyRobot surgeryTotal

Identifiers

PMID36205818
PMCPMC9547043
OpenAlexW4303427154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.