Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36205776›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2023

[Acceptance of psychosocial bridging measures in dementia : Treatment observation during the COVID-19 pandemic].

V Buschert, B Leicher, C Rogl, J Hoffmann, A-L Blum, N Scherbaum, J Benninghoff

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acceptance of psychosocial bridging measures in context of dementia.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

V BuschertZentrum für Altersmedizin und Entwicklungsstörungen, kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost, Ringstr. 52, 85540, Haar, Deutschland.
B LeicherZentrum für Altersmedizin und Entwicklungsstörungen, kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost, Ringstr. 52, 85540, Haar, Deutschland.
C RoglZentrum für Altersmedizin und Entwicklungsstörungen, kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost, Ringstr. 52, 85540, Haar, Deutschland.
J HoffmannZentrum für Altersmedizin und Entwicklungsstörungen, kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost, Ringstr. 52, 85540, Haar, Deutschland.
A-L BlumZentrum für Altersmedizin und Entwicklungsstörungen, kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost, Ringstr. 52, 85540, Haar, Deutschland.
N ScherbaumKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Essen, Kliniken und Institut der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Wickenburgstraße 21, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
J BenninghoffZentrum für Altersmedizin und Entwicklungsstörungen, kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost, Ringstr. 52, 85540, Haar, Deutschland. jens.benninghoff@kbo.de.
Isar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost · DEKliniken Essen-Mitte · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the event of a COVID-19-related absence from an outpatient treatment program, patients suffering from dementia and their caregivers were offered support from a distance. The aim was to examine the extent of the participants' burden as well as how the offer was accepted and evaluated. MATERIAL AND

methodsAll participants (n = 63) were offered supportive telephone contact over a period of 8 weeks at varying frequencies (weekly, fortnightly). In addition patients received cognitive and physical tasks by mail every 2 weeks. In order to examine the acceptance of the support, data collected from clinical routine were included in a treatment observation. Additionally, all participants were asked to evaluate the support retrospectively.

resultsOut of 63 contacted participants, 45 were included in the treatment observation. The telephone support was very well accepted and a tendency towards higher agreement could be ascertained by caregivers. The experience of burden remained stable at a moderate level for all participants; however, caregivers were significantly more burdened.

conclusionThe present treatment observation shows the acceptance of a location-independent psychosocial treatment program for dementia for future pandemics or treatment failure as well as for the routine care, e.g. for patients with restricted mobility or those living in rural areas without direct hospital connection. In particular, our data strengthen the importance of programs for caregivers in order to alleviate their burden.

Indexed as

BurdenCaregiver supportCognitive trainingSupportTemporary cessation of treatment

Identifiers

PMID36205776
PMCPMC9540087
OpenAlexW4303199194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.