Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36205738›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2023

Host-associated and Environmental Microbiomes in an Open-Sea Mediterranean Gilthead Sea Bream Fish Farm.

Grazia Marina Quero, Roberta Piredda, Marco Basili, Giulia Maricchiolo, Simone Mirto, Elena Manini, Anne Mette Seyfarth, Marco Candela, Gian Marco Luna

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Probiotic paradox: bacillibactin fromISME communications · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Grazia Marina Quero *Institute for Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnologies, National Research Council (CNR-IRBIM), Ancona, Italy. grazia.quero@irbim.cnr.it.
Roberta Piredda *Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Valenzano (Bari), Italy.
Marco BasiliInstitute for Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnologies, National Research Council (CNR-IRBIM), Ancona, Italy.
Giulia MaricchioloInstitute of Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnologies, National Research Council (CNR-IRBIM), Messina, Italy.
Simone MirtoInstitute of Anthropic Impacts and Sustainability in Marine Environment, National Research Council (IAS-CNR), Palermo, Italy.
Elena ManiniInstitute for Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnologies, National Research Council (CNR-IRBIM), Ancona, Italy.
Anne Mette SeyfarthDepartment of Global Surveillance, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Marco CandelaAlma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Gian Marco LunaInstitute for Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnologies, National Research Council (CNR-IRBIM), Ancona, Italy.
Institute for Marine Biological Resources and BiotechnologyNational Research Council · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITTechnical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gilthead seabream is among the most important farmed fish species in the Mediterranean Sea. Several approaches are currently applied to assure a lower impact of diseases and higher productivity, including the exploration of the fish microbiome and its manipulation as a sustainable alternative to improve aquaculture practices. Here, using 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing, we explored the microbiome of farmed seabream to assess similarities and differences among microbial assemblages associated to different tissues and compare them with those in the surrounding environment. Seabream had distinct associated microbiomes according to the tissue and compared to the marine environment. The gut hosted the most diverse microbiome; different sets of dominant ASVs characterized the environmental and fish samples. The similarity between fish and environmental microbiomes was higher in seawater than sediment (up to 7.8 times), and the highest similarity (3.9%) was observed between gill and seawater, suggesting that gills are more closely interacting with the environment. We finally analyzed the potential connections occurring among microbiomes. These connections were relatively low among the host's tissues and, in particular, between the gut and the others fish-related microbiomes; other tissues, including skin and gills, were found to be the most connected microbiomes. Our results suggest that, in mariculture, seabream microbiomes reflect only partially those in their surrounding environment and that the host is the primary driver shaping the seabream microbiome. These data provide a step forward to understand the role of the microbiome in farmed fish and farming environments, useful to enhance disease control, fish health, and environmental sustainability.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSea BreamAnimalsAquacultureFisheriesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAquaculture sustainabilityFish microbiomeGilthead seabreamMediterranean Sea

Identifiers

PMID36205738
PMCPMC10335962
OpenAlexW4303427388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.