Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36205621›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral rehabilitation2022

Automated detection of smiles as discrete episodes.

Hisham Mohammed, Reginald Kumar, Hamza Bennani, Jamin B Halberstadt, Mauro Farella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Association of Clinical, Biomechanical, and Psychosocial Factors with Smile Dynamics in Unilateral Cleft Lip: A Multicenter Observational Study.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Observational
  2. Review
  3. Smile analysis in dentistry and orthodontics - a review.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Automated detection of smiles as discrete episodes.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hisham MohammedDiscipline of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Reginald KumarDiscipline of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Hamza BennaniSchool of Information Technology, Otago Polytechnic, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Jamin B HalberstadtDepartment of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Mauro FarellaDiscipline of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4516-647X

Funding

Colgate-Palmolive CompanySir John Walsh Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients seeking restorative and orthodontic treatment expect an improvement in their smiles and oral health-related quality of life. Nonetheless, the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of dynamic smiles are yet to be understood.

objectiveTo develop, validate, and introduce open-access software for automated analysis of smiles in terms of their frequency, genuineness, duration, and intensity. MATERIALS AND

methodsA software script was developed using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) and artificial intelligence to assess activations of (1) cheek raiser, a marker of smile genuineness; (2) lip corner puller, a marker of smile intensity; and (3) perioral lip muscles, a marker of lips apart. Thirty study participants were asked to view a series of amusing videos. A full-face video was recorded using a webcam. The onset and cessation of smile episodes were identified by two examiners trained with FACS coding. A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was then used to assess detection accuracy and optimise thresholding. The videos of participants were then analysed off-line to automatedly assess the features of smiles.

resultsThe area under the ROC curve for smile detection was 0.94, with a sensitivity of 82.9% and a specificity of 89.7%. The software correctly identified 90.0% of smile episodes. While watching the amusing videos, study participants smiled 1.6 (±0.8) times per minute.

conclusionsFeatures of smiles such as frequency, duration, genuineness, and intensity can be automatedly assessed with an acceptable level of accuracy. The software can be used to investigate the impact of oral conditions and their rehabilitation on smiles.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceQuality of LifeFacial ExpressionHumansLipSmilingorthodonticssmilingvalidation studies

Identifiers

PMID36205621
PMCPMC9828522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.