Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36205570›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurotrauma2023

Development of Traumatic Brain Injury Associated Intracranial Hypertension Prediction Algorithms: A Narrative Review.

Robert McNamara, Shiv Meka, James Anstey, Daniel Fatovich, Luke Haseler, Toby Jeffcote, Andrew Udy, Rinaldo Bellomo, Melinda Fitzgerald

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurotrauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Management Strategies Based on Multi-Modality Neuromonitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robert McNamaraDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Shiv MekaData Innovation Laboratory, Western Australian Department of Health, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
James AnsteyDepartment of Intensive Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Daniel FatovichDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Luke HaselerCurtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Toby JeffcoteDepartment of Intensive Care, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew UdyDepartment of Intensive Care, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rinaldo BellomoDepartment of Intensive Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Melinda FitzgeraldCurtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic intracranial hypertension (tIH) is a common and potentially lethal complication of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (m-sTBI). It often develops with little warning and is managed reactively with the tiered application of intracranial pressure (ICP)-lowering interventions administered in response to an ICP rising above a set threshold. For over 45 years, a variety of research groups have worked toward the development of technology to allow for the preemptive management of tIH in the hope of improving patient outcomes. In 2022, the first operationalizable tIH prediction system became a reality. With such a system, ICP lowering interventions could be administered prior to the rise in ICP, thus protecting the patient from potentially damaging tIH episodes and limiting the overall ICP burden experienced. In this review, we discuss related approaches to ICP forecasting and IH prediction algorithms, which collectively provide the foundation for the successful development of an operational tIH prediction system. We also discuss operationalization and the statistical assessment of tIH algorithms. This review will be of relevance to clinicians and researchers interested in development of this technology as well as those with a general interest in the bedside application of machine learning (ML) technology.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticIntracranial HypertensionAlgorithmsHumansIntracranial PressureMonitoring, Physiologicintracranial hypertensionintracranial hypertension predictionintracranial pressure forecastingmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID36205570
PMCPMC9986028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.