Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36205504›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2023

Three-Year Interval for the Multi-Target Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Longitudinal Study.

Thomas F Imperiale, Philip T Lavin, Tara N Marti, Debbie Jakubowski, Steven H Itzkowitz, Folasade P May, Paul J Limburg, Seth Sweetser, Anas Daghestani, Barry M Berger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas F ImperialeIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0001-7586-1073
Philip T LavinBoston Biostatistics Research Foundation, Framingham, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-8381-0740
Tara N MartiExact Sciences Corporation, LLC, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0003-2375-6815
Debbie JakubowskiDelfi Diagnostics, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-3524-3761
Steven H ItzkowitzIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-0436-5416
Folasade P MayVatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases and UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-6706-8171
Paul J LimburgExact Sciences Corporation, LLC, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-2428-5675
Seth SweetserMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-9251-0136
Anas DaghestaniAustin Regional Clinic, Austin, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-0716-015X
Barry M BergerExact Sciences Corporation, LLC, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0003-0308-1304
Exact Sciences (United States) · USAustin Regional Clinic · USCCC Diagnostics (United States) · USFramingham State University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USKaiser Permanente · USMayo Clinic · USRegenstrief Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data supporting the clinical utility of multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) at the guideline-recommended 3-year interval have not been reported.Between April 2015 and July 2016, candidates for colorectal cancer screening whose providers prescribed the mt-sDNA test were enrolled. Participants with a positive baseline test were recommended for colonoscopy and completed the study. Those with a negative baseline test were followed annually for 3 years. In year 3, the mt-sDNA test was repeated and colonoscopy was recommended independent of results. Data were analyzed using the Predictive Summary Index (PSI), a measure of the gain in certainty for dichotomous diagnostic tests (where a positive value indicates a net gain), and by comparing observed versus expected colorectal cancers and advanced precancerous lesions.Of 2,404 enrolled subjects, 2,044 (85%) had a valid baseline mt-sDNA result [284 (13.9%) positive and 1,760 (86.1%) negative]. Following participant attrition, the year 3 intention to screen cohort included 591 of 1,760 (33.6%) subjects with valid mt-sDNA and colonoscopy results, with no colorectal cancers and 63 advanced precancerous lesions [22 (34.9%) detected by mt-sDNA] and respective PSI values of 0% (P = 1) and 9.3% (P = 0.01). The observed 3-year colorectal cancer yield was lower than expected (one-sided P = 0.09), while that for advanced precancerous lesions was higher than expected (two-sided P = 0.009).Repeat mt-sDNA screening at a 3-year interval resulted in a statistically significant gain in detection of advanced precancerous lesions. Due to absence of year 3 colorectal cancers, the PSI estimate for colorectal cancer was underpowered and could not be reliably quantified. Larger studies are required to assess the colorectal cancer study findings. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Understanding the 3-year yield of mt-sDNA for colorectal cancer and advanced precancerous polyps is required to ensure the clinical appropriateness of the 3-year interval and to optimize mt-sDNA's screening effectiveness.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsPrecancerous ConditionsColonoscopyDNAEarly Detection of CancerFecesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMass ScreeningDNA

Identifiers

PMID36205504
PMCPMC9900315
OpenAlexW4303514209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.