Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36205157›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2022

Listening to patients: Opportunities to improve reproductive wellness for women with chronic conditions.

Sarah Verbiest, Crystal Cené, Erica Chambers, Marina Pearsall, Kristin Tully, Rachel Peragallo Urrutia

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah VerbiestJordan Institute for Families, School of Social Work, Collaborative for Maternal and Infant Health School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2491-1170
Crystal CenéOffice for Equity, Diversity and Inclusion, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.
Erica ChambersThe Social Equity Collective, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Marina PearsallGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8555-0065
Kristin TullyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5214-2287
Rachel Peragallo UrrutiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1398-5123
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand how Black and Native American women with chronic conditions experience reproductive health care and identify patient-centered strategies to improve care. STUDY SETTING AND

participantsWe held a series of virtual focus groups between February 2021 and December 2021 with 34 women who self-identified as Black or Native American, were of childbearing age, had one or more chronic conditions, and lived in North Carolina. STUDY DESIGN AND ANALYSIS: This qualitative, community-engaged study reviewed notes, video recordings, and graphic illustrations from the focus group sessions. Content analysis was used to iteratively identify themes. Emerging themes were reviewed by community and patient partners. PRINCIPAL

findingsThere were six thematic areas that emerged on the current state of reproductive health care for people with chronic conditions: (1) lack of trust in health care providers and institutions, (2) lack of health care provider knowledge, (3) uncoordinated care, (4) need for self-advocacy, (5) provider bias, and (6) mental health strain from coping. Six approaches for care improvement emerged: (1) build on models of coordinated health care services from other conditions to design more comprehensive care clinics, (2) involve care coordinators or navigators, (3) improve educational materials for patients, (4) train clinicians to increase their capacity to be trustworthy and provide quality, equitable, person-focused care, (5) design scripts to improve clinicians' ability to talk with women about infertility, miscarriage, infant loss, and (6) all interventions and research should be co-designed to address patient priorities.

conclusionsEngaging Black and Native American patient partners with chronic conditions in research planning is feasible, necessary, and beneficial using methods that support connection, respect, and bi-directional learning. Patient partners defined actionable strategies to improve reproductive care and wellness including comprehensive care clinics with patient navigators, trust-enhancing interventions, and better provision of reproductive health related education.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelChronic DiseaseFemaleFocus GroupsHumansNorth CarolinaQualitative Researchchronic conditionspreconception healthreproductive healthwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID36205157
PMCPMC9643093
OpenAlexW4303516901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.