ArticleNeural regeneration research2023
Safety and effectiveness of electromyography-induced rehabilitation treatment after epidural electrical stimulation for spinal cord injury: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidural electrical stimulation is a new treatment method for spinal cord injury (SCI). Its efficacy and safety have previously been reported. Rehabilitation treatment after epidural electrical stimulation is important to ensure and improve the postoperative efficacy of epidural electrical stimulation in patients with SCI. Considering that electromyography (EMG)-induced rehabilitation treatment can accurately match the muscle contraction of patients with SCI, we designed a study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial. In this trial, on the premise of adjusting the spinal cord electrical stimulator to obtain the maximum EMG signal of the target muscle, patients with SCI receiving epidural electrical stimulation will undergo EMG-induced rehabilitation treatment. Recovery of muscle strength of key muscles, quality of life, safety and therapeutic effects will be monitored. Twenty patients with SCI who are scheduled to undergo epidural electrical stimulation in Shanghai Ruijin Rehabilitation Hospital will be randomly divided into two groups with 10 patients per group. The control group will receive conventional rehabilitation treatment. The EMG-induced rehabilitation group will receive EMG-induced rehabilitation treatment of the target muscles of the upper and lower limbs based on conventional rehabilitation treatment. After rehabilitation treatment, follow up for all patients will occur at 2 weeks and 1, 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome measure of this trial will be evaluation of target muscle recovery using the Manual Muscle Testing grading scale. Secondary outcome measures will include modified Barthel Index scores, integrated EMG values, the visual analogue scale, Spinal Cord Independence Measure scores, and modified Ashworth scale scores. The safety indicator will be the incidence of adverse events. This trial will collect data regarding the therapeutic effects of EMG-induced rehabilitation in patients with SCI receiving epidural electrical stimulation for 6 months after rehabilitation treatment. Findings from this trial will help develop rehabilitation methods in patients with SCI after epidural electrical stimulation. This study protocol was approved by Ethics Committee of Shanghai Ruijin Rehabilitation Hospital (Approval No. RKIRB2022-12) on February 15, 2022 and was registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2200061674; date: June 30, 2022). Study protocol version: 1.0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.