Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36204839›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2023

Pathophysiological mechanisms of chronic compressive spinal cord injury due to vascular events.

Zhen-Xiao Ren, Jing-Hui Xu, Xing Cheng, Gui-Xing Xu, Hou-Qing Long

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Preoperative risk stratification for long-term neurological status in spinal ependymoma: an MRI-centered nomogram.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. NeuroAiDBiomedicines · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhen-Xiao RenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopaedics and Traumatology/Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Jing-Hui XuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopaedics and Traumatology/Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Xing ChengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopaedics and Traumatology/Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Gui-Xing XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Hou-Qing LongGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopaedics and Traumatology/Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is the main cause of non-traumatic spinal cord injury, with chronic static and/or dynamic compressive spinal cord injury as the unique pathogenesis. In the progression of this condition, the microvascular network is compressed and destroyed, resulting in ischemia and hypoxia. The main pathological changes are inflammation, damage to the blood spinal cord barriers, and cell apoptosis at the site of compression. Studies have confirmed that vascular regeneration and remodeling contribute to neural repair by promoting blood flow and the reconstruction of effective circulation to meet the nutrient and oxygen requirements for nerve repair. Surgical decompression is the most effective clinical treatment for this condition; however, in some patients, residual neurological dysfunction remains after decompression. Facilitating revascularization during compression and after decompression is therefore complementary to surgical treatment. In this review, we summarize the progress in research on chronic compressive spinal cord injury, covering both physiological and pathological changes after compression and decompression, and the regulatory mechanisms of vascular injury and repair.

Indexed as

angiogenesiscervical spondylotic myelopathyhypoxiainflammationischemiaspinal cord injurysurgical decompression

Identifiers

PMID36204839
PMCPMC9700100
OpenAlexW4296955574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.