Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36204716›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2022

The impact of pulse timing on cortical and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation evoked potentials.

Brett A Campbell, Leonardo Favi Bocca, David Escobar Sanabria, Julio Almeida, Richard Rammo, Sean J Nagel, Andre G Machado, Kenneth B Baker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Brett A CampbellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Leonardo Favi BoccaCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
David Escobar SanabriaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Julio AlmeidaCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Richard RammoCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Sean J NagelCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Andre G MachadoDepartment of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Kenneth B BakerDepartment of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Cleveland Clinic · USThe Neurological Institute · USCase Western Reserve University · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of pulse timing is an important factor in our understanding of how to effectively modulate the basal ganglia thalamocortical (BGTC) circuit. Single pulse low-frequency DBS-evoked potentials generated through electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) provide insight into circuit activation, but how the long-latency components change as a function of pulse timing is not well-understood. We investigated how timing between stimulation pulses delivered in the STN region influence the neural activity in the STN and cortex. DBS leads implanted in the STN of five patients with Parkinson's disease were temporarily externalized, allowing for the delivery of paired pulses with inter-pulse intervals (IPIs) ranging from 0.2 to 10 ms. Neural activation was measured through local field potential (LFP) recordings from the DBS lead and scalp EEG. DBS-evoked potentials were computed using contacts positioned in dorsolateral STN as determined through co-registered post-operative imaging. We quantified the degree to which distinct IPIs influenced the amplitude of evoked responses across frequencies and time using the wavelet transform and power spectral density curves. The beta frequency content of the DBS evoked responses in the STN and scalp EEG increased as a function of pulse-interval timing. Pulse intervals <1.0 ms apart were associated with minimal to no change in the evoked response. IPIs from 1.5 to 3.0 ms yielded a significant increase in the evoked response, while those >4 ms produced modest, but non-significant growth. Beta frequency activity in the scalp EEG and STN LFP response was maximal when IPIs were between 1.5 and 4.0 ms. These results demonstrate that long-latency components of DBS-evoked responses are pre-dominantly in the beta frequency range and that pulse interval timing impacts the level of BGTC circuit activation.

Indexed as

betadeep brain stimulationevoked potentialsParkinson' diseasepulse timing

Identifiers

PMID36204716
PMCPMC9532054
OpenAlexW4297906660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.