Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36204597›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2022

Automated analysis of whole slide digital skin biopsy images.

Shima Nofallah, Wenjun Wu, Kechun Liu, Fatemeh Ghezloo, Joann G Elmore, Linda G Shapiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shima NofallahDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Wenjun WuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Kechun LiuPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Fatemeh GhezlooPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Joann G ElmoreDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Linda G ShapiroDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

A Unified Machine Learning Package for Cancer DiagnosisU01CA231782 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ELMORE, JOANN G, SHAPIRO, LINDA · 2018 to 2020
$980k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA231782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A rapidly increasing rate of melanoma diagnosis has been noted over the past three decades, and nearly 1 in 4 skin biopsies are diagnosed as melanocytic lesions. The gold standard for diagnosis of melanoma is the histopathological examination by a pathologist to analyze biopsy material at both the cellular and structural levels. A pathologist's diagnosis is often subjective and prone to variability, while deep learning image analysis methods may improve and complement current diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. Mitoses are important entities when reviewing skin biopsy cases as their presence carries prognostic information; thus, their precise detection is an important factor for clinical care. In addition, semantic segmentation of clinically important structures in skin biopsies might help the diagnosis pipeline with an accurate classification. We aim to provide prognostic and diagnostic information on skin biopsy images, including the detection of cellular level entities, segmentation of clinically important tissue structures, and other important factors toward the accurate diagnosis of skin biopsy images. This paper is an overview of our work on analysis of digital whole slide skin biopsy images, including mitotic figure (mitosis) detection, semantic segmentation, diagnosis, and analysis of pathologists' viewing patterns, and with new work on melanocyte detection. Deep learning has been applied to our methods for all the detection, segmentation, and diagnosis work. In our studies, deep learning is proven superior to prior approaches to skin biopsy analysis. Our work on analysis of pathologists' viewing patterns is the only such work in the skin biopsy literature. Our work covers the whole spectrum from low-level entities through diagnosis and understanding what pathologists do in performing their diagnoses.

Indexed as

deep learningdiagnosismelanocytemelanomamitosissemantic segmentationviewing patternswhole slide image

Identifiers

PMID36204597
PMCPMC9531680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.