Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36204498›Full record

ArticleMedicine access @ point of care

You Have Options: Implementing and evaluating a contraceptive choice social marketing campaign.

Beth Sundstrom, Andrea L DeMaria, Merissa Ferrara, Stephanie Meier, Kerri Vyge, Deborah Billings, Dee DiBona, Bridget M McLernon Sykes

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine access @ point of care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Beth SundstromDepartment of Communication, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-2941
Andrea L DeMariaDepartment of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Merissa FerraraDepartment of Communication, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA.
Stephanie MeierDepartment of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Kerri VygeHonors College, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA.
Deborah BillingsUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Dee DiBonaUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Bridget M McLernon SykesStudent Health Services, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Up to two-thirds of pregnancies among young, unmarried women in the United States are unintended, despite increased access to highly effective contraceptive options. Aim: This study implemented and evaluated a social marketing campaign designed to increase access to a full range of contraceptive methods among women aged 18-24 years on a southeastern university campus. Methods: Researchers partnered with Choose Well and Student Health Services to design, implement, and evaluate Results: Participants demonstrated a significant increase in knowledge about intrauterine devices (IUDs) between pretest ( Conclusion: Findings from the study offer practical recommendations for implementing social marketing campaigns aimed at increasing access to LARC and reducing unintended pregnancy.

Indexed as

campaignsContraceptionhealth communicationsocial marketing

Identifiers

PMID36204498
PMCPMC9413606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.