Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36204473›Full record

ArticleGates open research2022

Women's groups and COVID-19: An evidence review on savings groups in Africa.

Olayinka Adegbite, Leigh Anderson, Sybil Chidiac, Osasuyi Dirisu, Jenna Grzeslo, Julia Hakspiel, Chinmaya Holla, Emily Janoch, Krishna Jafa, Shubha Jayaram and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gates open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Olayinka AdegbiteIndependent Consultant, Ibidan, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6661-9522
Leigh AndersonEPAR Evans School of Public Policy and Governance, Seattle, USA.
Sybil ChidiacBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1175-3804
Osasuyi DirisuPopulation Council, Abuja, Nigeria.
Jenna GrzesloBRAC USA, New York, USA.
Julia HakspielMarketShare Associates, Washington DC, USA.
Chinmaya HollaInternational Development Division, American Institutes for Research, Bangalore, India.
Emily JanochCARE International, Washington DC, USA.
Krishna JafaGlobal Center for Gender Equality, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Shubha JayaramBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, USA.
Grace MajaraCARE International, Kampala, Uganda.
Tabitha MulyampitiSchool of Women and Gender Studies, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Eve NamisangoAfrica Centre for Systematic Reviews, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Eva NobleWomen for Women International, Kampala, Uganda.
Bukola OnyishiWomen for Women International, Abuja, Nigeria.
David PanettaSEEP Network, Washington DC, USA.
Garima SiwachInternational Development Division, American Institutes for Research, Austin, USA.
Munshi SulaimanBRAC Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Rebecca WalcottEPAR Evans School of Public Policy and Governance, Seattle, USA.
Sapna DesaiPopulation Council, New Delhi, India.
Thomas de HoopInternational Development Division, American Institutes for Research, Washington DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0033-1139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and some of the associated policy responses have resulted in significant gendered impacts that may reverse recent progress in gender equality, including in sub-Saharan Africa. This paper presents emerging evidence from studies in diverse contexts in sub-Saharan Africa -with a deep dive into Nigeria and Uganda-on how COVID-19 has affected women's groups, especially savings groups, and how these groups have helped mitigate the gendered effects of the pandemic's and the associated policy responses' consequences up until April 2021. The synthesis presents evidence that savings groups found ways to continue operating, provided leadership opportunities for women during the pandemic, and mitigated some of the negative economic consequences of COVID-19 on individual savings group members. Savings, credit, and group support from other members all likely contributed to the ability of groups to positively affect the resilience of women's group member during COVID-19. Households with a female member in a savings group in Nigeria and Uganda have coped with the crisis better than those not in savings groups. While savings groups have shown the potential for resilience during the pandemic, they often faced financial challenges because of decreased savings, which sometimes resulted in the depletion of group assets. Savings groups also contributed to community responses and provided women a platform for leadership. These findings are consistent with a recent evidence synthesis on how past covariate shocks affected women's groups and their members. We conclude the paper by presenting various policy recommendations to enable savings groups to achieve improvements in women's empowerment and economic outcomes, and research recommendations to address some of the current evidence gaps on how COVID-19 is affecting women's groups and their members.

Indexed as

AfricaCOVID-19Gender EqualityNigeriaResilience; Gender; Women’s EmpowermentSavings GroupsUgandaWomen's Groups

Identifiers

PMID36204473
PMCPMC9513104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.