Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36204368›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2022

Probiotics, a promising therapy to reduce the recurrence of bacterial vaginosis in women? a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Wei Keong Chieng, Muhammad Irfan Abdul Jalal, Jashveerdeep Singh Bedi, Ani Amelia Zainuddin, Mohd Helmy Mokhtar, Muhammad Azrai Abu, Kah Teik Chew, Abdul Ghani Nur Azurah

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. The Gut-Vagina Axis.Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Vaginal Microbiome: Setting the Stage for Cancer?The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  10. Bacterial vaginosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Human intestinal microbiome: Role in health and disease.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wei Keong ChiengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UKM Medical Centre, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Muhammad Irfan Abdul JalalUKM Medical Molecular Biology Institute, UKM Medical Centre, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Jashveerdeep Singh BediDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.
Ani Amelia ZainuddinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UKM Medical Centre, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Mohd Helmy MokhtarDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Muhammad Azrai AbuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UKM Medical Centre, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Kah Teik ChewDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UKM Medical Centre, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Abdul Ghani Nur AzurahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UKM Medical Centre, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
National University of Malaysia · MYUniversity Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre · MYHospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The evidence for probiotic efficacy in preventing bacterial vaginosis (BV) recurrences among women aged 18 years and above is sparse. We aimed to ascertain the efficacy of probiotics in preventing BV recurrences after at least one menstrual cycle in this population. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid interface), Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Embase, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Cochrane Library databases and registries comprised of Open Science Framework (OSF) preprints registry, the ClinicalTrials.gov (USA), WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO-ICTRP), International Standard RCT Number (ISRCTN) registry, limited to randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in English published between January 2000 and December 2021. The inclusion criteria were trials that administered probiotics to BV-positive women in an experimental arm of at least 20 samples. The usage of probiotics should be preceded with standard antibiotic regimen and followed by a reassessment of BV status after at least a single menstrual cycle. Risk of bias assessment was completed using revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). The PROSPERO registration number of the review is CRD42022302044. Results: From 8,162 identified records, we included 10 studies ( Interpretation: Probiotics were associated with more than twofold reduction in BV recurrences when BV status was assessed after at least 1-month postintervention. Further high-quality and methodologically standardized RCTs should evaluate probiotic efficacy for BV prevention in a diverse community setting. Systematic review registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021290613], identifier [CRD42021290613].

Indexed as

1-month postinterventionmeta-regressionprobiotics effectivenessrisk ratiosingle menstrual cyclestandard antibiotics regimen

Identifiers

PMID36204368
PMCPMC9530327
OpenAlexW4296389438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.