Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36204359›Full record

ArticleCurrent urology2022

Reconstruction of the male external genitalia in diverse disease processes: Our reconstructive algorithm, techniques, and experience.

Stefanie M Croghan, Caroline Kelly, Anne E Daniels, Linda Fitzgibbon, Pádraig J Daly, Ivor M Cullen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefanie M CroghanDepartment of Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
Caroline KellyDepartment of Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
Anne E DanielsDepartment of Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
Linda FitzgibbonDepartment of Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
Pádraig J DalyDepartment of Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
Ivor M CullenDepartment of Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
University Hospital Waterford · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Male genital form and function may be rendered abnormal by a number of disease processes, with profound associated psychological and functional consequences. The aim of the study is to review our reconstructive experience with cases of genital loss or distortion due to nonmalignant diseases processes and atypical neoplasia. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify reconstructive cases performed from 2018 to 2020 under the care of a single surgeon. Male patients 18 years or older with a disease diagnosis other than squamous cell carcinoma affecting genital form were included. Disease processes, patient factors, surgical techniques, and both functional and cosmetic outcomes were reviewed. Results: Fourteen cases were identified. The patients had a mean age of 52.2 years (range, 21-72 years). Acquired buried penis was present in 8 patients. Etiology of genital abnormality included balanitis xerotica obliterans (n = 6), excess skin loss at circumcision (n = 2), self-injection of petroleum jelly to penile shaft (n = 1), Fournier gangrene (n = 1), hidradenitis suppurativa (n = 1), extramammary Paget disease (n = 1), idiopathic lymphoedema (n = 1), and penoscrotal webbing (n = 1). Reconstructive techniques performed included penile debridement/shaft skin release, scrotectomy, suprapubic apronectomy, and division of penoscrotal webbing, in combination with split-thickness skin grafting where required. A penile implant was inserted in one patient. Reconstructive planning, techniques, and outcomes are described. Conclusions: A variety of reconstructive techniques in andrology can be used to improve the aesthetic and functional outcomes of multiple disease processes affecting the male external genitalia.

Indexed as

Balanitis xerotica obliteransBuried penisGenital reconstructionGenital reconstruction algorithmGenital skin graftsHidradenitis suppurativaMale genitaliaPenoscrotal webSuprapubic apronectomy

Identifiers

PMID36204359
PMCPMC9527933
OpenAlexW4297233454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.