Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36204341›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Cerebrospinal fluid leaks following intradural spinal surgery-Risk factors and clinical management.

Moritz Lenschow, Moritz Perrech, Sergej Telentschak, Niklas von Spreckelsen, Julia Pieczewski, Roland Goldbrunner, Volker Neuschmelting

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Drain versus no drain after intradural spine surgery: a 10-year multicenter study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Moritz LenschowCenter for Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Moritz PerrechCenter for Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sergej TelentschakCenter for Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Niklas von SpreckelsenCenter for Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Julia PieczewskiCenter for Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Roland GoldbrunnerCenter for Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Volker NeuschmeltingCenter for Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
University Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid leakage (CSFL) following spinal durotomy can lead to severe sequelae. However, while several studies have investigated accidental spinal durotomies, the risk factors and influence of clinical management in planned durotomies remain unclear. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent planned intradural spinal surgery at our institution between 2010 and 2020. Depending on the occurrence of a CSFL, patients were dichotomized and compared with respect to patient and case-related variables as well as dural closure technique, epidural drainage placement, and timing of mobilization. Results: A total of 351 patients were included. CSFL occurred in 4.8% of all cases. Surgical indication, tumor histology, location within the spine, previous intradural surgery, and medical comorbidities were not associated with an increased risk of CSFL development (all Conclusion: CSFL following planned durotomy pose a relevant and quantifiable complication risk of surgery that should be factored in during preoperative patient counseling. Our data could not demonstrate superiority of any particular dural closure technique but support the safety of both early mobilization within 24 h postoperatively and epidural drainage with reduced or no force of suction.

Indexed as

cerebrospinal fluid leakdrainagemobilizationpostoperative complicationsspine

Identifiers

PMID36204341
PMCPMC9530256
OpenAlexW4296389690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.