Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36204305›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2022

Effect of Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Donor Site Morbidity in Breast Reconstruction with Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap.

Songsu Kang, Seiko Okumura, Yoko Maruyama, Ikuo Hyodo, Ryota Nakamura, Saya Kobayashi, Maho Kato, Keisuke Takanari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Songsu KangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Seiko OkumuraDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Yoko MaruyamaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Ikuo HyodoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Ryota NakamuraDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Saya KobayashiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Maho KatoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Keisuke TakanariDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Aichi Cancer Center · JPUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The usefulness of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been well documented in many surgical sites, except for the donor site of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ciNPWT on microsurgical breast reconstruction using a DIEP flap. Methods: Fifty-six cases of breast reconstruction with DIEP flap were included and divided into two groups based on post-surgical wound management: the ciNPWT group received ciNPWT at the donor site, while the conventional group received conventional wound management. The primary outcomes were the incidence of seroma, wound dehiscence, and surgical site infection, and secondary outcomes were the time to drain removal and amount of drainage. The breast reconstruction risk assessment (BRA) score was used to evaluate the comprehensive risk in each case. Results: Among the patient and surgical characteristics, only the BRA score (P=0.02) and the time to elevate the flap (P=0.02) were significantly higher and longer in the ciNPWT group, respectively. The incidence of seroma, dehiscence, and wound infection showed no significant difference between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis of patients with body mass index ≥ 25, the primary outcomes did not differ, while the secondary outcomes were significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (drainage volume, P = 0.04; time to drain removal, P = 0.04). Conclusion: ciNPWT can potentially reduce the incidence of donor site complications of DIEP flaps, especially if the comprehensive risk for post-surgical complications is considered.

Indexed as

Breast reconstructionClosed incision negative pressure wound therapyDeep inferior epigastric artery perforator flapPostoperative wound complication

Identifiers

PMID36204305
PMCPMC9529661
OpenAlexW4292202217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.