Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36204263›Full record

ReviewiScience2022

Challenges and opportunities in continuous flow processes for electrochemically mediated carbon capture.

Yayuan Liu, Éowyn Lucas, Ian Sullivan, Xing Li, Chengxiang Xiang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unveiling Advances in Membrane Materials for COACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026
    Review
  2. Leveraging Electrons for Electrochemical COAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yayuan LiuDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Éowyn LucasLiquid Sunlight Alliance, Department of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91104, USA.
Ian SullivanLiquid Sunlight Alliance, Department of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91104, USA.
Xing LiDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Chengxiang XiangLiquid Sunlight Alliance, Department of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon capture from both stationary emitters and dilute sources is critically needed to mitigate climate change. Carbon dioxide separation methods driven by electrochemical stimuli show promise to sidestep the high-energy penalty and fossil-fuel dependency associated with the conventional pressure and temperature swings. Compared with a batch process, electrochemically mediated carbon capture (EMCC) operating in a continuous flow mode offers greater design flexibility. Therefore, this review introduces key advances in continuous flow EMCC for point source, air, and ocean carbon captures. Notably, the main challenges and future research opportunities for practical implementation of continuous flow EMCC processes are discussed from a multi-scale perspective, from molecules to electrochemical cells and finally to separation systems.

Indexed as

Chemical engineeringChemistryElectrochemistryProcess engineering

Identifiers

PMID36204263
PMCPMC9529983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.