Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36204115›Full record

ArticleCoastal management : an international journal of marine environment, resources, law, and society2021

Community Science for Coastal Acidification Monitoring and Research.

Parker Randall Gassett, Katie O'Brien-Clayton, Carolina Bastidas, Jennie E Rheuban, Christopher W Hunt, Elizabeth Turner, Matthew Liebman, Emily Silva, Adam R Pimenta, Jason Grear and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Coastal management : an international journal of marine environment, resources, law, and society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Citizen Science Studies in Nursing: A Systematic Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Parker Randall GassettDepartment of Marine Science, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA.
Katie O'Brien-ClaytonConnecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Carolina BastidasMIT Sea Grant Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jennie E RheubanDepartment of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA.
Christopher W HuntOcean Process Analysis Laboratory, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA.
Elizabeth TurnerNOAA Scientist Emeritus, Durham, New Hampshire, USA.
Matthew LiebmanEnvironmental Protection Agency, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Emily SilvaNortheastern Regional Association of Coastal Ocean Observing Systems, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, USA.
Adam R PimentaAtlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division, Environmental Protection Agency, Narragansett, Rhode Island, USA.
Jason GrearAtlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division, Environmental Protection Agency, Narragansett, Rhode Island, USA.
Jackie MotykaNortheastern Regional Association of Coastal Ocean Observing Systems, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, USA.
Daniel McCorkleDepartment of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Massachusetts, USA.
Esperanza StancioffUniversity of Maine Cooperative Extension and Maine Sea Grant, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA.
Damian C BradySchool of Marine Science, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA.
Aaron L StrongEnvironmental Studies Program, Hamilton College, Clinton, New York, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocean and coastal acidification (OCA) present a unique set of sustainability challenges at the human-ecological interface. Extensive biogeochemical monitoring that can assess local acidification conditions, distinguish multiple drivers of changing carbonate chemistry, and ultimately inform local and regional response strategies is necessary for successful adaptation to OCA. However, the sampling frequency and cost-prohibitive scientific equipment needed to monitor OCA are barriers to implementing the widespread monitoring of dynamic coastal conditions. Here, we demonstrate through a case study that existing community-based water monitoring initiatives can help address these challenges and contribute to OCA science. We document how iterative, sequential outreach, workshop-based training, and coordinated monitoring activities through the Northeast Coastal Acidification Network (a) assessed the capacity of northeastern United States community science programs and (b) engaged community science programs productively with OCA monitoring efforts. Our results (along with the companion manuscript) indicate that community science programs are capable of collecting robust scientific information pertinent to OCA and are positioned to monitor in locations that would critically expand the coverage of current OCA research. Furthermore, engaging community stakeholders in OCA science and outreach enabled a platform for dialogue about OCA among other interrelated environmental concerns and fostered a series of co-benefits relating to public participation in resource and risk management. Activities in support of community science monitoring have an impact not only by increasing local understanding of OCA but also by promoting public education and community participation in potential adaptation measures.

Indexed as

citizen sciencecommunityscienceocean acidificationtotal alkalinitywater monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36204115
PMCPMC9534045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.