ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Disrupted topological properties of the structural brain network in patients with cerebellar infarction on different sides are associated with cognitive impairment.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cognition in cerebellar disorders: What's in the profile? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Frontal, temporal, cerebellar changes link to sepsis survivors' cognitive issues: A resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Effects of Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at Different Frequencies on Working Memory: An EEG Study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Left Cerebellar Lesions may be Associated with an Increase in Spatial Neglect-like Symptoms.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Article
- Reorganized brain functional network topology in stable and progressive mild cognitive impairment.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore changes in the brain structural network in patients with cerebellar infarction on different sides and their correlations with changes in cognitive function. Methods: Nineteen patients with acute left posterior cerebellar infarction and 18 patients with acute right posterior cerebellar infarction seen from July 2016 to September 2019 in the Department of Neurology, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, were selected. A total of 27 healthy controls matched for sex, age, and years of education were recruited. The subjects underwent head diffusion magnetic resonance imaging examination and neuropsychological cognitive scale evaluation, and we analyzed changes in brain structural network properties in patients with cerebellar infarction and their correlation with changes in patients' cognitive function. Results: The Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) and the Rey auditory verbal learning test (RAVLT) scores in the left and right cerebellar infarction groups were significantly lower than those in the healthy control group ( Conclusion: Patients with cerebellar infarction have cognitive impairment. Unilateral cerebellar infarction can reduce the network efficiency of key regions in the bilateral cerebral hemispheres, and these abnormal changes are closely related to patient cognitive impairment. The results of this study provide evidence for understanding the underlying neural mechanisms of cerebellar cognitive impairment and suggest that brain topological network properties may be markers of cerebellar cognitive impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.