ArticlePulmonary circulation2022
Prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions with disease-specific treatments in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A registry study.
Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Depression in Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes, Treatment Interactions, and Emerging Technologies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Management of Mild Pulmonary Hypertension in Clinical Practice.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Review
- Prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions with disease-specific treatments in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A registry study.Pulmonary circulation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polypharmacy increases the risk of drug-drug interactions that may disturb treatment effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of codispensing of potentially interacting or contraindicated drugs related to PH-specific treatment in the Swedish pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) population. All prescribed drugs, on an individual level, dispensed 2016-2017 at pharmacies to patients with PAH or CTEPH were obtained from The National Board of Health and Welfare's pharmaceutical registry. Potential drug-drug interactions were investigated using the Drug Interaction tool in the IBM Micromedex® database. There were 4785 different dispensed drugs from 572 patients (mean age 61 ± 16 years, 61% female, mean number of drugs per patient 8.4 ± 4.2) resulting in 1842 different drug combinations involving a PH-specific treatment. Of these drug combinations, 67 (3.5%) had a potential drug-drug interaction considered clinically relevant and it affected 232 patients (41%). The PH-specific drugs with the highest number of potential drug-drug interactions was bosentan (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.