ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2022
TRACking health behaviors in people with Multiple Sclerosis (TRAC-MS): Study protocol and description of the study sample.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of Internet-Based Mind-Body Training for Adults With Subjective Cognitive Decline: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: People with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) experience a range of physical, cognitive, and affective symptoms. Behavioral interventions targeting increased physical activity show promising support as low-cost methods to improve working memory, episodic memory, and processing speed in PwMS. In this randomized controlled trial, we will examine the efficacy of a pedometer-tracking intervention, designed to increase low-to-moderate levels of physical activity, for improving working memory in PwMS. Methods and Analysis: Eighty-seven PwMS, between the ages of 30-59, have been recruited for the study. Seventy-five of the eligible and interested individuals were randomized to six-month health behavior monitoring groups: a Step-track group or a Water-track group (serving as the active control). Neuropsychological measures, assessing the primary outcome of the study, were administered at pre, midpoint, and post-intervention. Exploratory factor analysis of neuropsychological measures resulted in three factors: a working memory/processing speed factor, a visual episodic memory factor, and a verbal episodic memory factor. Changes in this latent measure of working memory/processing speed is the primary outcome of the current study. Functional MRI data will be analyzed to examine changes in the functional connectivity of the neural network supporting working memory. Ethics and dissemination: The institutional review board granted approval for the study and all participants provided written informed consent. The results of this study will provide support showing that step-tracking increases overall levels of physical activity, improves working memory and processing speed, and strengthens the neural circuitry that supports better cognition. Evidence from this study will thus offer promising support for the routine use of step-tracking devices to improve cognitive functioning in PwMS. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific conferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.