Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36203818›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2022

Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block Using Programmed Intermittent Bolus Regimen versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Opioid Analgesia Within an Enhanced Recovery Program After Open Liver Resection in Patients with Coagulation Disorder: A Randomized, Controlled, Non-Inferiority Trial.

Jiali Wang, Fang Du, Yimei Ma, Yuncen Shi, Jie Fang, Jing Xv, Jing Cang, Changhong Miao, Xiaoguang Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiali Wang *Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Fang Du *Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yimei MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yuncen ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3439-2159
Jie FangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jing XvDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jing CangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Changhong MiaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoguang ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Postoperative pain after open hepatectomy is significant. Preoperative coagulopathy limits the use of epidural analgesia, the gold standard for pain control in open abdominal surgery. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel regional anesthesia technique that has been shown to provide effective analgesia in abdominal surgery. In this study, we compared the analgesic efficacy of patient-controlled continuous ESPB (CESPB) with hydromorphone patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after right subcostal incision hepatectomies in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with preoperative coagulopathy. Patients and Methods: In this randomized, controlled, unblinded, and noninferiority trial, 120 patients were randomized to receive either CESPB or PCIA as primary postoperative analgesia together with parecoxib (40mg Q12 h IV) for 3 days after surgery. The primary outcome was the average cough-elicited pain numeric rating scales (NRS) recorded at the seven follow-up time points of 20:00 on the day of surgery and 9:00 and 15:00 on the postoperative day 1 to day 3 (POD1 to POD3). Results: The average cough-elicited pain NRS score was 2.402 in the CESPB group and 2.676 in the PCIA group. The mean difference (95% CI) was -0.274 (-0.620 to 0.072), which demonstrated the noninferiority of CESPB to PCIA. Patients in the CESPB group had less intraoperative opioid consumption, a lower incidence of moderate-to-severe pain and PONV at POD3, and early resumption of oral intake. Conclusion: CESPB provides analgesic efficacy noninferior to opioid PCIA in the context of multimodal analgesia after right subcostal incision open hepatectomy.

Indexed as

Blood Coagulation DisordersNerve BlockAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidCoughHepatectomyHumansHydromorphoneLiverPostoperative PainAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidHydromorphoneacute painblood coagulation disorderserector spinae plane blockhepatectomypatient-controlled analgesiaultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36203818
PMCPMC9531613
OpenAlexW4298008293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.