Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36203788›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2022

Ultrasound Guided Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Patient Controlled Analgesia in Open Nephrectomy for Renal Malignancies: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Ahmed Salah Abdelgalil, Ahmed Mansour Ahmed, Reham M Gamal, Mamdouh Mahmoud Elshal, Ahmed Hussein Bakeer, Ehab Hanafy Shaker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmed Salah AbdelgalilAnesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-8281-0282
Ahmed Mansour AhmedAnesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-3086-3670
Reham M GamalAnesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mamdouh Mahmoud ElshalAnesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed Hussein BakeerAnesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ehab Hanafy ShakerAnesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-6182-632X
Cairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It is critical to manage acute postoperative pain for patient satisfaction and better outcome. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can produce sensory blocking on both visceral and somatic levels. This study aimed to evaluate the ESPB efficacy in controlling acute postoperative pain in open nephrectomy for renal malignancies. Methods: This prospective randomized, controlled, open-label trial included 60 cases scheduled for open nephrectomy for renal malignancy under general anesthesia. Cases were assigned randomly into two equal groups. Group E administered continuous preoperative unilateral ESPB (20mL bupivacaine 0.25% bolus then 6 mL/h 0.1% for 48 hours). Group C administered intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine (0.01 mg/kg/h). Postoperative analgesia was managed by morphine (3 mg IV in group E or 0.01 mg/kg bolus with a 15-min lockout in group C) to keep the visual analog scale (VAS) scores <4. Results: Intraoperative fentanyl consumption and total morphine consumption in 1st 48 hours postoperatively were significantly lower in group E than group C (P= 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). The time to first analgesic request was significantly longer in group E than group C (P <0.001). VAS scores at movement and rest were significantly lower in group E than group C (P <0.001). Conclusion: In renal malignancies, ESPB provided better analgesia with prolonged time and lower pain scores at both rest and movement compared to IV PCA following open nephrectomy.

Indexed as

analgesiaerector spinae plane blocknephrectomyPCArenal malignancy

Identifiers

PMID36203788
PMCPMC9531616
OpenAlexW4297963275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.