ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Clinical characteristics of new-onset acute kidney injury in patients with established acute respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective single-center
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Mitophagy in kidney and lung epithelial cells: molecular mechanisms, crosstalk, and therapeutic interventions.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Temporal Relationship and Clinical Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury Following Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Critical care explorations · 2024Review
- Biomarker Signatures of Severe Acute Kidney Injury in a Critically Ill Cohort of COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Illness.Critical care explorations · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We assessed the incidence and clinical characteristics of acute kidney injury (AKI) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients and its effect on clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a single-center prospective longitudinal study. Patients who met the Berlin definition of ARDS in the medical ICU in China-Japan Friendship Hospital from March 1, 2016, to September 30, 2020, were included. AKI was defined according to the KDIGO clinical practice guidelines. Early and late AKI were defined as AKI occurring within 48 h after ARDS was diagnosed or after 48 h, respectively. Results: Of the 311 ARDS patients, 161 (51.8%) developed AKI after ICU admission. Independent risk factors for AKI in ARDS patients were age (OR 1.027, 95% CI 1.009-1.045), a history of diabetes mellitus (OR 2.110, 95%CI 1.100-4.046) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR 9.328, 95%CI 2.393-36.363), APACHE II score (OR 1.049, 95%CI 1.008-1.092), average lactate level in the first 3 days (OR 1.965, 95%CI 1.287-3.020) and using ECMO support (OR 2.359, 95%CI 1.154-4.824). Early AKI was found in 91 (56.5%) patients and late AKI was found in 70 (43.5%). Early AKI was related to the patient's underlying disease and the severity of hospital admission, while late AKI was related to the application of nephrotoxic drugs. The mortality rate of ARDS combined with AKI was 57.1%, which was independently associated with shock (OR 54.943, 95%CI 9.751-309.573). Conclusion: A significant number of patients with ARDS developed AKI, and the mortality rate for ARDS patients was significantly higher when combined with AKI. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be routinely used to avoid drug toxicity during treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.