Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36203742›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2022

Optimized workflow to minimise intra-fractional motion during stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases.

W M vanNiekerk, T Lazeroms, S J Rogers, N Lomax, R A Hälg, V Gajdos, I Özden, E Kessler, O Riesterer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of intrafractional motion on targeting accuracy in frameless single-isocenter multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W M vanNiekerkRadio-Onkologie-Zentrum KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland.
T LazeromsRadio-Onkologie-Zentrum KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland.
S J RogersRadio-Onkologie-Zentrum KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland.
N LomaxRadio-Onkologie-Zentrum KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland.
R A HälgRadio-Onkologie-Zentrum KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland.
V GajdosKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsspital Basel, Switzerland.
I ÖzdenFachstelle Strahlenschutz, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland.
E KesslerRadio-Onkologie-Zentrum KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland.
O RiestererRadio-Onkologie-Zentrum KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland.
Kantonsspital Aarau · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: This study evaluated translational and rotational intra-fractional patient movement during spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using 6D positioning based on 3D cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) and stereoscopic kilovoltage imaging (ExacTrac). The aim was to determine whether additional intra-fractional image verification reduced intra-fractional motion without significantly prolonging treatment time, whilst maintaining acceptable imaging related dose. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of 38 patients with 41 primary tumour volumes treated with SBRT between September 2018 and May 2021 was performed. Three different image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) workflows were assessed. The translational and rotational positioning errors for the different imaging workflows, 3D translational vectors and estimates of imaging dose delivered for the different imaging workflows were evaluated. Results: As the frequency of intra-fractional imaging increased from workflow 1 to 3, the mean intra-fraction 3D translational vector improved from 0.91 mm (±0.52 mm), to 0.64 (±0.34 mm). 85 %, 83 % and 97 % of images were within a tolerance of 1 mm/1° for workflows 1, 2 and 3 respectively, based on post treatment CBCT images. The average treatment time for workflow 3 was 13 min, as compared to 12 min for workflows 1 and 2. The effective dose per treatment for IGRT workflows 1, 2 and 3 measured 0.6 mSv, 0.95 mSv and 1.8 mSv respectively. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the use of additional intra-fractional stereoscopic kilovoltage image-guidance during spinal SBRT, reduced the number of measurements deemed "out of tolerance" and treatment delivery could be optimized within a standard treatment timeslot without applying substantial additional radiation dose.

Indexed as

3D cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT)Doseimage guided radiotherapy (IGRT)Intra-fractional motionRadiotherapySix degrees of freedom (6 DoF)Spinal metastasisstereoscopic kilovoltage imaging (ExacTrac)Stereotactic body radiosurgery (SBRS)Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)Treatment time

Identifiers

PMID36203742
PMCPMC9530958
OpenAlexW4298148393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.