Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36203681›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Vaccine acceptance in rural India: Engaging faith leaders as vaccine ambassadors.

Preetika Banerjee, Rajeev Seth, Baldeep K Dhaliwal, Alexis Sullivan, Yawar Qiayum, Betty Thankachen, Svea Closser, Anita Shet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Preetika BanerjeeInternational Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Rajeev SethBal Umang Drishya Sanstha, New Delhi, India.
Baldeep K DhaliwalInternational Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Alexis SullivanInternational Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Yawar QiayumBal Umang Drishya Sanstha, New Delhi, India.
Betty ThankachenBal Umang Drishya Sanstha, New Delhi, India.
Svea ClosserInternational Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Anita ShetInternational Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Religious faith is a key marker of identity and shapes community perspectives and trust. Faith leader involvement in vaccine campaigns in India have been beneficial to counter misinformation regarding infectious diseases such as polio. Faith leaders are influential stakeholders who bear potential to enhance public confidence in vaccine campaigns. Context: While vaccine coverage has been increasing in India, inequities abound, especially in populations with historically low vaccine confidence. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to major disruptions in delivery of routine immunization services for children. To address these challenges, we co-designed interventions aimed at contextual communication strategies and peer support. Engaging faith leaders was an important part of this intervention. In this report we describe our experience and highlight the perspectives of faith leaders and their expectations of the outcomes for this intervention. Programmatic elements: The CIVIC Project, conducted from January to December 2021 aimed to engage caregivers, community health workers and key stakeholders, particularly, faith leaders in co-designing interventions to address vaccine hesitancy in Mewat. The project, deeply rooted in community based participatory research, used a three-E approach (Exploration of community perspectives, Establishment of vaccine trust and awareness, Engagement in vaccine promotion activities) to successfully engage faith leaders in the design and dissemination of media messages advocating for vaccine acceptance and uptake. Lessons learned: The involvement of faith leaders in the intervention benefited the community in two ways. First, faith leaders were spotlighted

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesChildHumansIndiaPandemicsVaccinationVaccinesfaith leader influencehealth communicationhealth promotionIndiavaccine acceptancevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36203681
PMCPMC9531688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.