Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36203566›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Neither COVID-19, nor cryopreservation, prevented allogeneic product infusion: A report from the National Marrow Donor Program.

Nosha Farhadfar, Jeni Newman, Jennifer Novakovich, Jacklyn Barten, Eric T Ndifon, Jason Oakes, Meghann Cody, Huy P Pham, Jeffery J Auletta, John P Miller and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nosha FarhadfarUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Jeni NewmanNational Marrow Donor Program/Be the Match, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jennifer NovakovichNational Marrow Donor Program/Be the Match, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jacklyn BartenNational Marrow Donor Program/Be the Match, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Eric T NdifonCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program/Be the Match, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jason OakesNational Marrow Donor Program/Be the Match, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Meghann CodyNational Marrow Donor Program/Be the Match, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Huy P PhamNational Marrow Donor Program/Be the Match, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jeffery J AulettaCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program/Be the Match, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
John P MillerNational Marrow Donor Program/Be the Match, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Steven M DevineCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program/Be the Match, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Heather E StefanskiCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program/Be the Match, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
National Marrow Donor Program · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in early 2020 has resulted in an unprecedented level of uncertainty and challenge for the stem cell donor registries. To address these challenges, rapid strategies were implemented by the National Marrow Donor Registry (NMDP) and its network partners. Herein, we aim to report the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the collection, utilization of grafts, and short-term outcomes of patients who received stem cell products from COVID-19-positive donors. Methods: NMDP data during the early phase (1 March 2020 through 1 May 2020) of the pandemic were compared to the later phase (1 March 2021 through 1 May 2021). Odds ratios were calculated to determine the impact of the pandemic on graft sources requested by transplant centers (TCs). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test the effect of the pandemic on the disease indication, volume of searches, and number of products not infused. Results: Although there was an initial decline in overall donor searches during the early phase of the pandemic, these numbers increased reaching pre-pandemic levels during the later phase. Urgent malignant diseases remained the most common indication for transplant in 2021. The pandemic necessitated cryopreservation of stem cell products due to transportation restrictions as well as clinical uncertainties in managing the virus. Cryopreserved grafts remained the most common requested grafts throughout the pandemic. In the later phase of the pandemic, the total numbers of requests for fresh grafts increased, mostly due to the increase in requests for fresh bone marrow (BM) grafts. As the pandemic continued, TCs became more accepting of cryopreservation, resulting in a reduction in the number of products not infused. Lastly, no short-term deleterious outcomes were noted among the patients who had stem cell products infused from a SARS-CoV-2-positive donor. Conclusion: Throughout the pandemic, the NMDP and TCs worked tirelessly to ensure that patients would receive lifesaving grafts when needed. The data reported here, although limited by small numbers, illustrate that transplantation from donors with COVID-19 is feasible and safe.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationBone MarrowCryopreservationHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19donor registryhematopoietic stem cellsNational Marrow Donor ProgramSARS-CoV-2unrelated donor

Identifiers

PMID36203566
PMCPMC9531692
OpenAlexW4297858950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.