Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36203532›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

The Application Value of MRI T2

Feng Huang, Xiaoyun Liu, Peng Liu, Dan Xu, Zeda Li, Huashan Lin, An Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Feng HuangDepartment of Radiology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha 410005, China.
Xiaoyun LiuDepartment of Radiology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha 410005, China.
Peng LiuDepartment of Radiology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha 410005, China.
Dan XuDepartment of Radiology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha 410005, China.
Zeda LiDepartment of Radiology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha 410005, China.
Huashan LinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Diagnosis, GE Healthcare, Changsha 410005, China.
An XieDepartment of Radiology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha 410005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5284-3486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To establish and validate an MRI T2 Methods: 174 patients were retrospectively collected, who were diagnosed with primary hepatic carcinoma by surgery or puncture pathology and received preoperative MRI scans including T2 Results: The radiomics model had the AUC of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.83-0.99) in the training and validation groups, respectively; the AUC of the radiomics nomogram was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99) in the training group and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99) in the validation group. DCA suggested the clinical application value of the nomogram model. Conclusion: Radiomics nomogram model based on MRI T2

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCholangiocarcinomaLiver NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNomogramsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36203532
PMCPMC9532145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.