Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36203438›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Recommendations for the treatment of vulvar cancer in settings with limited resources: Report from the International Gynecological Cancer Society consensus meeting.

Fernando Cotait Maluf, Graziela Dal Molin Zibetti, Eduardo Paulino, Andreia Cristina de Melo, Douglas Racy, Robson Ferrigno, Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson Junior, Reitan Ribeiro, Renato Moretti, Jose Carlos Sadalla and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Fernando Cotait MalufHospital BP Mirante, São Paulo, Brazil.
Graziela Dal Molin ZibettiHospital BP Mirante, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo PaulinoOncomed, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Andreia Cristina de MeloInstituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Douglas RacyHospital BP Mirante, São Paulo, Brazil.
Robson FerrignoHospital BP Mirante, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson JuniorHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Reitan RibeiroInstituto de Oncologia do Paraná, Paraná, Brazil.
Renato MorettiHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jose Carlos SadallaHospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Angelica Nogueira RodriguesUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Filomena Marino CarvalhoFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Glauco BaiocchiA. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Donato Callegaro-FilhoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roberto AngioliHospital BP Mirante, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Due to scant literature and the absence of high-level evidence, the treatment of vulvar cancer is even more challenging in countries facing limited resources, where direct application of international guidelines is difficult. Recommendations from a panel of experts convened to address some of these challenges were developed. Methods: The panel met in Rio de Janeiro in September 2019 during the International Gynecological Cancer Society congress and was composed of specialists from countries in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. The panel addressed 62 questions and provided recommendations for the management of early, locally advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic vulvar cancer. Consensus was defined as at least 75% of the voting members selecting a particular recommendation, whereas a majority vote was considered when one option garnered between 50.0% and 74.9% of votes. Resource limitation was defined as any issues limiting access to qualified surgeons, contemporary imaging or radiation-oncology techniques, antineoplastic drugs, or funding for the provision of contemporary medical care. Results: Consensus was reached for nine of 62 (14.5%) questions presented to the panel, whereas a majority vote was reached for 29 (46.7%) additional questions. For the remaining questions, there was considerable heterogeneity in the recommendations. Conclusion: The development of guidelines focusing on areas of the world facing more severe resource limitations may improve medical practice and patient care.

Indexed as

chemotherapygynecologic cancerslimited resourceslimited resources countriesvulvar cancer

Identifiers

PMID36203438
PMCPMC9530794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.