ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Evaluation of colorectal cancer liver metastases based on liquid biopsy combined with folate receptor- Positive circulating tumor cells and HSP90.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Significance and Correlation Analysis of Folate Receptor-Positive Circulating Tumor Cells (FR + CTC) in Colorectal Cancer Patients.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Redefining cancer care: harnessing circulating tumor cells' potential for improved diagnosis and prognosis.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Role of Folate in Liver Diseases.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Circulating extracellular vesicle-derived MARCKSL1 is a potential diagnostic non-invasive biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Role of Serum CYFRA 21-1 in Diagnosis and Prognostic in Colorectal Liver Metastases.Cancer management and research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Liver metastasis of colorectal cancer (LMCRC) is a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. We can reduce the mortality rate by discerning the risk of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer at an early stage. Hence, we combined the use of folate receptor (FR)-labeled circulating tumor cells (FR+CTCs) and the metastasis-related marker, heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), to screen patients with colorectal cancer and explore the prognostic factors of patients with high expression of FR+CTC and HSP90. Patients and methods: A retrospective study of 356 patients with measurable colorectal cancer was performed. Negative enrichment and FR-targeted fluorescence quantitative PCR was utilized to detect FR+CTC. An ELISA kit was used to detect HSP90 expression. A timely follow-up study of patients with colorectal cancer was made. Results: Colorectal patients with liver metastases showed high expression of FR+CTCs and HSP90. The diagnostic ability of the combined receiver operating characteristic curve of FR+CTC and HSP90 (area under the curve [AUC]=0.79, sensitivity 70.55%, specificity 92.66%) was significantly greater than that of a single index. The results of timely follow-up of patients showed that the high expression of FR+CTC significantly shortened the median disease-free survival (mDFS) of 36.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.13-58.87, Logrank Conclusion: Patients with colorectal cancer and high expression of FR+CTC and HSP90 are at risk of liver metastasis and this suggests a poor prognosis. Combining the two markers can improve the early screening and diagnosis of LMCRC patients. In addition, combining a multivariate risk model can further assist patients in appropriate stratification and the design of tailored treatment regimens. However, further validation these markers is needed before their routine clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.