ArticleMedical physics2023
Automated lung tumor delineation on positron emission tomography/computed tomography via a hybrid regional network.
Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Meta-Analysis of Deep-Learning-Based Fusion of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography in Oncologic Imaging.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Fractal-driven self-supervised learning enhances early-stage lung cancer GTV segmentation: a novel transfer learning framework.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Deep Learning Approaches for Automated Prediction of Treatment Response in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Based on CT and PET Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Review
- Evaluating deep learning auto-contouring for lung radiation therapy: A review of accuracy, variability, efficiency and dose, in target volumes and organs at risk.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Review
- In Regard to Trotter et al.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Light on Alzheimer's disease: from basic insights to preclinical studies.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Review
- Classification of non-small cell lung cancer by histologic subtype using deep learning in public and private data sets of computed tomography images.Radiologia brasileiraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultimodality positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging combines the anatomical information of CT with the functional information of PET. In the diagnosis and treatment of many cancers, such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), PET/CT imaging allows more accurate delineation of tumor or involved lymph nodes for radiation planning. PURPOSE: In this paper, we propose a hybrid regional network method of automatically segmenting lung tumors from PET/CT images.
methodsThe hybrid regional network architecture synthesizes the functional and anatomical information from the two image modalities, whereas the mask regional convolutional neural network (R-CNN) and scoring fine-tune the regional location and quality of the output segmentation. This model consists of five major subnetworks, that is, a dual feature representation network (DFRN), a regional proposal network (RPN), a specific tumor-wise R-CNN, a mask-Net, and a score head. Given a PET/CT image as inputs, the DFRN extracts feature maps from the PET and CT images. Then, the RPN and R-CNN work together to localize lung tumors and reduce the image size and feature map size by removing irrelevant regions. The mask-Net is used to segment tumor within a volume-of-interest (VOI) with a score head evaluating the segmentation performed by the mask-Net. Finally, the segmented tumor within the VOI was mapped back to the volumetric coordinate system based on the location information derived via the RPN and R-CNN. We trained, validated, and tested the proposed neural network using 100 PET/CT images of patients with NSCLC. A fivefold cross-validation study was performed. The segmentation was evaluated with two indicators: (1) multiple metrics, including the Dice similarity coefficient, Jacard, 95th percentile Hausdorff distance, mean surface distance (MSD), residual mean square distance, and center-of-mass distance; (2) Bland-Altman analysis and volumetric Pearson correlation analysis.
resultsIn fivefold cross-validation, this method achieved Dice and MSD of 0.84 ± 0.15 and 1.38 ± 2.2 mm, respectively. A new PET/CT can be segmented in 1 s by this model. External validation on The Cancer Imaging Archive dataset (63 PET/CT images) indicates that the proposed model has superior performance compared to other methods.
conclusionThe proposed method shows great promise to automatically delineate NSCLC tumors on PET/CT images, thereby allowing for a more streamlined clinical workflow that is faster and reduces physician effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.