Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36203293›Full record

ArticleNeurospine2022

Effect of Acute Physical Interventions on Pathophysiology and Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Nicholle E Lewis, Troy Q Tabarestani, Brianna R Cellini, Nina Zhang, Eric J Marrotte, Haichen Wang, Daniel T Laskowitz, Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr, Timothy D Faw

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06154122 (The Feasibility of Virtual Reality-Based Activities for Upper Limb Rehabilitation of People With Acute/Sub-Acute Tetraplegia), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06154122 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Feasibility of Virtual Reality-Based Activities for Upper Limb Rehabilitation of People With Acute/Sub-Acute Tetraplegia

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlasgow Caledonian UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled12ConditionsTetraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries, Upper Extremity ParalysisArmsVirtual Reality Upper Limb Rehabilitation Games, Upper Limb Rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. "White Cord Syndrome" as clinical manifestation of the spinal cord reperfusion syndrome: a systematic review of risk factors, treatments, and outcome.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of blood flow restriction combined with routine rehabilitation in incomplete thoracic and lumbar spinal cord injury after decompression: a retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mobilization in Neurocritical Care: Challenges and Opportunities.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Innovative Strategies in 3D Bioprinting for Spinal Cord Injury Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholle E LewisDoctor of Physical Therapy Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Troy Q TabarestaniSchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Brianna R CelliniDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Nina ZhangDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Eric J MarrotteDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Haichen WangDepartment of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Daniel T LaskowitzDepartment of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Muhammad M Abd-El-BarrDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Timothy D FawDoctor of Physical Therapy Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Duke Institute for Brain Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical rehabilitation is essential for enhancing recovery in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI); however, aside from early surgical intervention and hemodynamic management, there are no proven interventions for promoting recovery in the acute phase. In general, early rehabilitation is considered beneficial, but optimal parameters and potential contraindications for implementing rehabilitation at very early time points are unclear. Moreover, clinical trials to date are limited to studies initiating rehabilitation 2 weeks after injury and later. To address these gaps, this article reviews the preclinical literature on physical interventions initiated within the first 8 days postinjury. Effects of early rehabilitation on molecular and structural nervous system changes, behavioral function, and body systems are considered. Most studies utilized treadmill or cycle training as the primary intervention. Treadmill training initiated within the first 3 days and terminated by 1 week after injury worsened autonomic function, inflammation, and locomotor outcomes, while swim training during this period increased microvascular dysfunction. In contrast, lower-intensity rehabilitation such as reach training, ladder training, or voluntary wheel or ball training showed benefits when implemented during the first 3 days. Rehabilitation initiated at 4 days postinjury was also associated with enhanced motor recovery. Cycling appears to have the greatest risk-benefit ratio; however, the effects of cycle training in the first 3 days were not investigated. Overall, research suggests that lower intensity or voluntary rehabilitation during the hyperacute phase is more appropriate until at least 4 days postinjury, at which point higher-intensity activity becomes safer and more beneficial for recovery.

Indexed as

Acute interventionEarly mobilizationRehabilitationSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID36203293
PMCPMC9537860
OpenAlexW4298004460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.