ArticleNeurospine2022
Safety and Feasibility of Augmented Reality Assistance in Minimally Invasive and Open Resection of Benign Intradural Extramedullary Tumors.
Article in Neurospine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- More than meets the eye: Augmented reality in surgical oncology.Journal of surgical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Augmented Reality Integration in Skull Base Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Pooled it
- Augmented reality in non-instrumentation minimally invasive spine surgery: a narrative review and future perspectives.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Review
- Unmasking benign intradural-extramedullary spinal tumors: a systematic review on treatment outcomes and radiological features.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Multidisciplinary En-Bloc Resection of Sacral Chordoma: A Narrative Review and Illustrative Case.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A bibliometric analysis of augmented reality and mixed reality applied in minimally invasive surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Augmented Reality in Scoliosis Correction Surgery: Efficiency and Accuracy in Pedicle Screw Instrumentation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Systematic Review Comparing Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Management of Intradural Extramedullary Tumours (IDEM).Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Precise localization value of lumbar lamina and ligamentum flavum boundaries in minimally invasive tubular resection of intraspinal schwannomas.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Image-Guided Navigation in Spine Surgery: From Historical Developments to Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Augmented Reality in Neurosurgery.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Augmented Reality in Neurosurgery: A New Paradigm for Training.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Role of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Complex in Spinal Deformity Secondary to Surgical Resection of the Intradural Tumor.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
- Augmented Reality to Improve Surgical Workflow in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion - A Feasibility Study With Case Series.Neurospine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSurgical resection of benign intradural extramedullary tumors (BIETs) is effective for appropriately selected patients. Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques have been described for successful resection of BIET while minimizing soft tissue injury. Augmented reality (AR) is a promising new technology that can accurately allow for intraoperative localization from skin through the intradural compartment. We present a case series evaluating the timing, steps, and accuracy at which this technology is able to enhance BIET resection.
methodsA protocol for MIS and open AR-guided BIET resection was developed and applied to determine the feasibility. The tumor is marked on diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using AR software. Intraoperatively, the planning MRI is fused with the intraoperative computed tomography. The position and size of the tumor is projected into the surgical microscope and directly into the surgeon's field of view. Intraoperative orientation is performed exclusively via navigation and AR projection. Demographic and perioperative factors were collected.
resultsEight patients were enrolled. The average operative time for MIS cases was 128 ± 8 minutes and for open cases 206 ± 55 minutes. The estimated intraoperative blood loss was 97 ± 77 mL in MIS and 240 ± 206 mL in open procedures. AR tumor location and margins were considered sufficiently precise by the surgeon in every case. Neither correction of the approach trajectory nor ultrasound assistance to localize the tumor were necessary in any case. No intraoperative complications were observed.
conclusionCurrent findings suggest that AR may be a feasible technique for tumor localization in the MIS and open resection of benign spinal extramedullary tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.