Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36203255›Full record

ArticleInternational neurourology journal2022

Data Gap in Sacral Neuromodulation Documentation: Call to Improve Documentation Protocols.

Christopher M Hornung, Ranveer Vasdev, Kate A Hanson, Rachael Gotlieb, Cynthia S Fok, John Fischer, Nissrine A Nakib, Dwight E Nelson

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International neurourology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher M HornungDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Ranveer VasdevDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kate A HansonDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Rachael GotliebDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Cynthia S FokDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
John FischerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nissrine A NakibDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Dwight E NelsonDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe quantified patient record documentation of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) threshold testing and programming parameters at our institution to identify opportunities to improve therapy outcomes and future SNM technologies.

methodsA retrospective review was conducted using 127 records from 40 SNM patients. Records were screened for SNM documentation including qualitative and quantitative data. The qualitative covered indirect references to threshold testing and the quantitative included efficacy descriptions and device programming used by the patient. Findings were categorized by visit type: percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE), stage 1 (S1), permanent lead implantation, stage 2 (S2) permanent impulse generator implantation, device-related follow-up, or surgical removal.

resultsDocumentation of threshold testing was more complete during initial implant visits (PNE and S1), less complete for S2 visits, and infrequent for follow-up clinical visits. Surgical motor thresholds were most often referred to using only qualitative comments such as "good response" (88%, 100% for PNE, S1) and less commonly included quantitative values (68%, 84%), locations of response (84%, 83%) or specific contacts used for testing (0%). S2 motor thresholds were less well documented with qualitative, quantitative, and anatomical location outcomes at 70%, 48%, and 36% respectively. Surgical notes did not include specific stimulation parameters or contacts used for tests. Postoperative sensory tests were often only qualitative (80%, 67% for PNE, S1) with quantitative values documented much less frequently (39%, 9%) and typically lacked sensory locations or electrode-specific results. For follow-up visits, <10% included quantitative sensory test outcomes. Few records (<7%) included device program settings recommended for therapy delivery and none included therapy-use logs.

conclusionWhile evidence suggests contact and parameter-specific programming can improve SNM therapy outcomes, there is a major gap in the documentation of this data. More detailed testing and documentation could improve therapeutic options for parameter titration and provide design inputs for future technologies.

Indexed as

Electronic health recordsImplantable neurostimulatorsRetrospective studyUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID36203255
PMCPMC9537436
OpenAlexW4297330049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.