Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36203201›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

Contextualizing critical thinking about health using digital technology in secondary schools in Kenya: a qualitative analysis.

Faith Chesire, Marlyn Ochieng, Michael Mugisha, Ronald Ssenyonga, Matt Oxman, Allen Nsangi, Daniel Semakula, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Simon Lewin, Nelson K Sewankambo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Faith ChesireInstitute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. faithchelagat@gmail.com.
Marlyn OchiengTropical Institute of Community Health and Development, Kisumu, Kenya.
Michael MugishaInstitute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ronald SsenyongaInstitute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Matt OxmanCentre for Epidemic Interventions Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Allen NsangiDepartment of Medicine, Makerere University, College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Daniel SemakulaDepartment of Medicine, Makerere University, College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Laetitia NyirazinyoyeSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Simon LewinCentre for Epidemic Interventions Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Nelson K SewankamboDepartment of Medicine, Makerere University, College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Margaret KasejeTropical Institute of Community Health and Development, Kisumu, Kenya.
Andrew D OxmanCentre for Epidemic Interventions Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Sarah RosenbaumCentre for Epidemic Interventions Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. saro@fhi.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8334-7664
Makerere University · UGNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOTropical Institute Of Community Health And Development · KESouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Rwanda · RW

Funding

Radiumhospitalets Forskningsstifltelse 69006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGood health decisions depend on one's ability to think critically about health claims and make informed health choices. Young people can learn these skills through school-based interventions, but learning resources need to be low-cost and built around lessons that can fit into existing curricula. As a first step to developing and evaluating digital learning resources that are feasible to use in Kenyan secondary schools, we conducted a context analysis to explore interest in critical thinking for health, map where critical thinking about health best fits in the curriculum, explore conditions for introducing new learning resources, and describe the information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructure available for teaching and learning.

methodsWe employed a qualitative descriptive approach. We interviewed 15 key informants, carried out two focus group discussions, observed ICT conditions in five secondary schools, reviewed seven documents, and conducted an online catalog of ICT infrastructure in all schools (n=250) in Kisumu County. Participants included national curriculum developers, national ICT officers, teachers, and national examiners. We used a framework analysis approach to analyze data and report findings.

findingsAlthough critical thinking is a core competence in the curriculum, critical thinking about health is not currently taught in Kenyan secondary schools. Teachers, health officials, and curriculum developers recognized the importance of teaching critical thinking about health in secondary schools. Stakeholders agreed that Informed Health Choices learning resources could be embedded in nine subjects. The National Institute of Curriculum Development regulates resources for learning; the development of new resources requires collaboration and approval from this body. Most schools do not use ICT for teaching, and for those few that do, the use is limited. Implementation of Kenya's ICT policy framework for schools faces several challenges which include inadequate ICT infrastructure, poor internet connectivity, and teachers' lack of training and experience.

conclusionTeaching critical thinking about health is possible within the current Kenyan lower secondary school curriculum, but the learning resources will need to be designed for inclusion in and across existing subjects. The National ICT Plan and Vision for 2030 provides an opportunity for scale-up and integration of technology in teaching and learning environments, which can enable future use of digital resources in schools. However, given the current ICT condition in schools in the country, digital learning resources should be designed to function with limited ICT infrastructure, unstable Internet access, and for use by teachers with low levels of experience using digital technology.

Indexed as

Context analysisCritical health literacyCritical thinkingCritical thinking about healthCurriculumHealth literacyKenyaSecondary school

Identifiers

PMID36203201
PMCPMC9535840
OpenAlexW4302293765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.