ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022
EnsembleSplice: ensemble deep learning model for splice site prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- SpliceDetector: A Splice Sites Detection Method Based on Biology Attention and Ensemble Module.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- Is a Win-Win possible? Achieving pareto-optimal privacy-utility balance in fine-tuned genome language model embeddings against embedding reconstruction attacks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Spliceread: improving canonical and non-canonical splice site prediction with residual blocks and synthetic data augmentation.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- UniSplicer: A deep-learning framework for accurate splice-site prediction and splice-altering mutation detection across diverse taxa.Plant communications · 2026Article
- Comprehensive review and assessment of multi-species splicing variant prediction: task-specific deep learning models and genomic foundation models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- SpliceRead: Improving Canonical and Non-Canonical Splice Site Prediction with Residual Blocks and Synthetic Data Augmentation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- BlendSplice: A Frequency-Blended Generative Framework forComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Impact of U2-type introns on splice site prediction in A. thaliana species using deep learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Splam: a deep-learning-based splice site predictor that improves spliced alignments.Genome biology · 2024Article
- DRANetSplicer: A Splice Site Prediction Model Based on Deep Residual Attention Networks.Genes · 2024Article
- EnsembleDL-ATG: Identifying autophagy proteins by integrating their sequence and evolutionary information using an ensemble deep learning framework.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying splice site regions is an important step in the genomic DNA sequencing pipelines of biomedical and pharmaceutical research. Within this research purview, efficient and accurate splice site detection is highly desirable, and a variety of computational models have been developed toward this end. Neural network architectures have recently been shown to outperform classical machine learning approaches for the task of splice site prediction. Despite these advances, there is still considerable potential for improvement, especially regarding model prediction accuracy, and error rate.
resultsGiven these deficits, we propose EnsembleSplice, an ensemble learning architecture made up of four (4) distinct convolutional neural networks (CNN) model architecture combination that outperform existing splice site detection methods in the experimental evaluation metrics considered including the accuracies and error rates. We trained and tested a variety of ensembles made up of CNNs and DNNs using the five-fold cross-validation method to identify the model that performed the best across the evaluation and diversity metrics. As a result, we developed our diverse and highly effective splice site (SS) detection model, which we evaluated using two (2) genomic Homo sapiens datasets and the Arabidopsis thaliana dataset. The results showed that for of the Homo sapiens EnsembleSplice achieved accuracies of 94.16% for one of the acceptor splice sites and 95.97% for donor splice sites, with an error rate for the same Homo sapiens dataset, 4.03% for the donor splice sites and 5.84% for the acceptor splice sites datasets.
conclusionsOur five-fold cross validation ensured the prediction accuracy of our models are consistent. For reproducibility, all the datasets used, models generated, and results in our work are publicly available in our GitHub repository here: https://github.com/OluwadareLab/EnsembleSplice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.