Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36203046›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in therapy2022

Reduced Posology of an Ophthalmic Hydrogel Containing Dexamethasone/Netilmicin to Prevent and Treat Ocular Inflammation After Cataract Surgery: Efficacy and Tolerability.

Rita Mencucci, Thomas Ach, Anja Liekfeld, Antonio Scialdone, Claudine Civiale, Maria Grazia Mazzone, Aldo Caporossi

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Modulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines byJournal of dental sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rita MencucciEye Clinic, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy. rita.mencucci@unifi.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1856-6363
Thomas AchAugenklinik Und Poliklinik, Würzburg, Germany.
Anja LiekfeldKlinikum für Augenheilkunde Ernst Von Bergman Klinikum, Posdam, Germany.
Antonio ScialdoneOphthalmology Unit, Fatebenefratelli Hospital and Ophthalmic Institute, Milan, Italy.
Claudine CivialeSocietà Industria Farmaceutica Italiana SpA, Via Ercole Patti 36, 95025, Aci Sant'Antonio, Catania, Italy.
Maria Grazia MazzoneSocietà Industria Farmaceutica Italiana SpA, Via Ercole Patti 36, 95025, Aci Sant'Antonio, Catania, Italy.
Aldo CaporossiOphthalmology Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Augenklinik Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEFatebenefratelli Hospital · ITKlinikum Ernst von Bergmann · DEUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo demonstrate efficacy and safety of an ophthalmic hydrogel formulation of netilmicin/dexamethasone, containing xanthan gum twice a day (b.i.d.) versus netilmicin/dexamethasone eye drops four times a day (q.i.d) to treat inflammation and prevention of infection after cataract surgery.

methodsPatients undergoing phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation (IOL) were randomised in two groups: group 1, twice daily (b.i.d.) dexamethasone 0.1%/netilmicin 0.3% (Netildex) ophthalmic gel; group 2, four times daily (q.i.d.) dexamethasone 0.1%/netilmicin 0.3% (Netildex) eye drops. Both treatments were administered for 14 days after surgery. Patients were evaluated before surgery, on the day of surgery and at 1, 7, 15 and 60 postoperative days. The primary efficacy endpoint was evaluation of cellularity and flare in the anterior chamber through slit-lamp biomicroscopy 7 days after surgery. Secondary endpoints included: presence of signs/symptoms of postoperative ocular inflammation and incidence of infection.

resultsOne hundred seventy-three patients were randomised and 168 were evaluable. Flare and cellularity were resolved at day 7 in 92.5% of patients and almost completely by day 15. In both intent to treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations, the efficacy analysis demonstrated that the gel formulation administered twice a day was non-inferior to the eye drops administered four times a day. For ITT analysis, the lower limit of the 97.5% confidence interval (- 0.0535) was greater than the non-inferiority limit of -0.10. For the PP analysis, the lower limit of the 97.5% confidence interval (- 0.0526) was greater than the non-inferiority limit of - 0.10. The patient's global tolerability and reported symptoms were similar between treatment groups. No microbial load and no safety events were observed.

conclusionsEfficacy of the gel reduced posology (twice a day) is not inferior to four times a day eye drops. Both treatments were well tolerated and efficacious. The new reduced posology hydrogel formulation may improve patient compliance and quality of life.

trial registrationEudract: 2016-0021138-63; ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT029738880.

Indexed as

CataractNetilmicinDexamethasoneDouble-Blind MethodHumansHydrogelsInflammationLens Implantation, IntraocularOphthalmic SolutionsPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeDexamethasoneHydrogelsNetilmicinOphthalmic SolutionsCataract surgeryDexamethasoneNetildexNetilmicinOcular inflammationOphthalmic gel

Identifiers

PMID36203046
PMCPMC9618540
OpenAlexW4302774106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.