ArticlePituitary2022
The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the multidisciplinary management of pituitary metastases.
Article in Pituitary, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stereotactic radiosurgery in pituitary metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Gamma knife radiosurgery for clival metastasis: case series and systematic review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Tumor control and motor function in patients with metastases located in the primary motor cortex after stereotactic radiosurgery.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary metastases: an international multi-institutional study.Pituitary · 2025Article
- Metastases to the pituitary gland: insights from the German pituitary tumor registry.Pituitary · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluates the role and outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in the management of pituitary metastases.
methodsThe records of brain metastases patients who underwent GKRS at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center during the 10-year interval of 2010-2020 were systematically reviewed. Outcome measures included patient survival, tumor control rate, pituitary hormonal outcomes, visual outcomes, adverse radiation effects (AREs), and need for adjuvant therapy.
resultsEighteen patients with pituitary metastases (eight male; median age of 65.5 years) had sufficient clinical follow-up for analysis. The most common primary cancers were non-small cell lung cancer (n = 6) and breast cancer (n = 4). Patients presented with headache (n = 9) and visual difficulties (n = 6). One patient underwent resection before GKRS. The median tumor volume was 0.78 cc (range 0.04-6.42 cc). The median overall survival after GKRS was 6.5 months (range 0.5-58 months). The overall survival after GKRS at 3-, 6-, and 12-months were 72.2%, 50.0% and 38.9%, respectively. The tumor control rate was 94.4%. One patient had further progression that required additional GKRS. None of the patients developed AREs after GKRS.
conclusionGKRS is an effective treatment modality for the multidisciplinary management of patients with pituitary metastases. This minimally-invasive strategy is associated with optimal tumor control rate and low risk to adjacent optic nerves or neurovascular structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.