ArticleScientific reports2022
Attribution of sensory prediction error to perception of muscle fatigue.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Somatosensory processing in long COVID fatigue and its relations with physiological and psychological factors.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Physical and cognitive contributions to fatigue perception: The interplay between local muscle fatigue and sensory prediction error.iScience · 2026Article
- The illusion of a "sense of body lightness" while walking: a preliminary exploratory study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Introspective Access or Retrospective Inference? Mind-Wandering Reports Are Shaped by Performance Feedback.Psychological science · 2025Article
- Somatosensory processing in long COVID fatigue and its relations with physiological and psychological factors.Experimental physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensory prediction-error is vital to discriminating whether sensory inputs are caused externally or are the consequence of self-action, thereby contributing to a stable perception of the external world and building sense of agency. However, it remains unexplored whether prediction error of self-action is also used to estimate the internal body condition. To address this point, we examined whether prediction error affects the perceived intensity of muscle fatigue. Participants evaluated fatigue while maintaining repetitive finger movements. To provide prediction error, we inserted a temporal delay into online visual feedback of self-movements. The results show that the subjective rating of muscle fatigue significantly increased under the delayed visual feedback, suggesting that prediction error enhances the perception of muscle fatigue. Furthermore, we introduced visual feedback that preceded actual finger movements to test whether the temporal direction of the mismatch is crucial in estimating muscle fatigue. We found that perceived fatigue was significantly weaker with preceding visual feedback compared to normal feedback, showing that the perception of muscle fatigue is affected by the signed prediction-error. Our findings support the idea that the brain flexibly attributes prediction errors to a self-origin with keeping sense of agency, or external origin by considering contexts and error characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.