ArticleScientific reports2022
Artificial intelligence in (gastrointestinal) healthcare: patients' and physicians' perspectives.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Barriers and Facilitators to Patient Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- AGA Living Clinical Practice Guideline on Computer-Aided Detection-Assisted Colonoscopy.Gastroenterology · 2025Guideline
- Artificial intelligence in endoscopy and colonoscopy: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global research trends.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Care of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An International Survey.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Prehospital Tele-Emergency Medicine: A Survey of Acceptance and Attitudes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Autonomous AI in prostate cancer: the road ahead towards clinical implementation.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Patients' experiences and attitudes toward the use of real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Article
- GeriAIGastroNet: AI-Assisted Gastrointestinal Polyp Segmentation and Severity-Based Triage for Tele-Gastroenterology in Underserved Geriatric Populations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Training future endoscopists: gastroenterology fellows' perspectives and hands-on exposure to artificial intelligence for polyp detection in the United States.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2026Article
- Endoscopist and Patients' Values and Preferences on Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: An Intercontinental Opinion Survey by the World Endoscopy Organization.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Article
- [Clinical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: A Human-Artificial Intelligence Interaction Perspective].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026Review
- Advanced computer-aided detection system exhibits no more false positives than experienced endoscopists in an image-based comparative study of colon polyps.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Translating AI to the Bedside with Physician Buy-In: Recommendations from a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Literature.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Asia-Pacific consensus on the use of artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2025Article
- Physicians' Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Mixed Methods Survey and Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Perception and Understanding of Artificial Intelligence Among Gastroenterology Fellows and Early Career Gastroenterologists: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Explainable AI in Digestive Healthcare and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Patient Perspective of Use of Artificial Intelligence During Colonoscopy.Gastro hep advances · 2025Review
- Attitudes toward artificial intelligence and robots in healthcare in the general population: a qualitative study.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Provider Attitudes and Perceptions on Using Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Gastro hep advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering into daily life and has the potential to play a significant role in healthcare. Aim was to investigate the perspectives (knowledge, experience, and opinion) on AI in healthcare among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, gastroenterologists, and GI-fellows. In this prospective questionnaire study 377 GI-patients, 35 gastroenterologists, and 45 GI-fellows participated. Of GI-patients, 62.5% reported to be familiar with AI and 25.0% of GI-physicians had work-related experience with AI. GI-patients preferred their physicians to use AI (mean 3.9) and GI-physicians were willing to use AI (mean 4.4, on 5-point Likert-scale). More GI-physicians believed in an increase in quality of care (81.3%) than GI-patients (64.9%, χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.