Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36202933›Full record

Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

Long-term follow-up of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy patients after primary treatment of oral eplerenone or half-dose photodynamic therapy and crossover treatment: SPECTRA trial report No. 3.

Helena M A Feenstra, Elon H C van Dijk, Thomas J van Rijssen, Roula Tsonaka, Roselie M H Diederen, Carel B Hoyng, Reinier O Schlingemann, Camiel J F Boon

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Oscillatory photodynamic therapy in central serous chorioretinopathy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Helena M A FeenstraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Elon H C van DijkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Thomas J van RijssenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Roula TsonakaDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Roselie M H DiederenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Carel B HoyngDepartment of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Reinier O SchlingemannDepartment of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Camiel J F BoonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. camiel.boon@amsterdamumc.nl.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek VENI grantUniversiteit Leiden the Gisela Thier Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeComparing anatomic and functional efficacy and safety of primary treatment with either half-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) or oral eplerenone, or crossover treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy patients.

methodsAfter the SPECTRA trial baseline visit, patients were randomized to either half-dose PDT or eplerenone and received crossover treatment if persistent subretinal fluid (SRF) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) was present at first follow-up (at 3 months). Presence of SRF and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was evaluated at 12 months.

resultsOut of the 90 patients evaluated at 12 months, complete SRF resolution was present on OCT in 43/48 (89.6%) of patients who were primarily randomized to half-dose PDT and in 37/42 (88.1%) who were primarily randomized to eplerenone. Out of the 42 patients that were primarily randomized to eplerenone, 35 received crossover treatment with half-dose PDT. The BCVA improved significantly more at 12 months in patients who had received primary half-dose PDT as compared to the primary eplerenone group (p = 0.030).

conclusionsTwelve months after baseline visit, most patients treated with half-dose PDT (either primary or crossover treatment) still had complete SRF resolution. The long-term BCVA in patients who receive primary half-dose PDT is better than in patients in whom PDT is delayed due to initial eplerenone treatment with persistent SRF.

Indexed as

Central Serous ChorioretinopathyPhotochemotherapyChronic DiseaseEplerenoneFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesHumansPhotosensitizing AgentsTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityEplerenonePhotosensitizing AgentsCentral serous chorioretinopathyEplerenoneLong-term follow-upMineralocorticoid receptor antagonistPhotodynamic therapySPECSSPECTRA trial

Identifiers

PMID36202933
PMCPMC9988736
OpenAlexW3177804274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.