Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36202867›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Detecting and mitigating simultaneous waves of COVID-19 infections.

Sebastian Souyris, Shuai Hao, Subhonmesh Bose, Albert Charles Iii England, Anton Ivanov, Ujjal Kumar Mukherjee, Sridhar Seshadri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian SouyrisLally School of Management, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, 12180, USA. souyrs@rpi.edu.
Shuai HaoDepartment of Business Administration, Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61820, USA.
Subhonmesh BoseDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Grainger College of Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Albert Charles Iii EnglandOSF HealthCare Heart of Mary Medical Center, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Anton IvanovDepartment of Business Administration, Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61820, USA.
Ujjal Kumar MukherjeeDepartment of Business Administration, Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61820, USA.
Sridhar SeshadriDepartment of Business Administration, Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61820, USA.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USIllinois College · USOSF HealthCare · USRensselaer Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sudden spread of COVID-19 infections in a region can catch its healthcare system by surprise. Can one anticipate such a spread and allow healthcare administrators to prepare for a surge a priori? We posit that the answer lies in distinguishing between two types of waves in epidemic dynamics. The first kind resembles a spatio-temporal diffusion pattern. Its gradual spread allows administrators to marshal resources to combat the epidemic. The second kind is caused by super-spreader events, which provide shocks to the disease propagation dynamics. Such shocks simultaneously affect a large geographical region and leave little time for the healthcare system to respond. We use time-series analysis and epidemiological model estimation to detect and react to such simultaneous waves using COVID-19 data from the time when the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus dominated the spread. We first analyze India's second wave from April to May 2021 that overwhelmed the Indian healthcare system. Then, we analyze data of COVID-19 infections in the United States (US) and countries with a high and low Indian diaspora. We identify the Kumbh Mela festival as the likely super-spreader event, the exogenous shock, behind India's second wave. We show that a multi-area compartmental epidemiological model does not fit such shock-induced disease dynamics well, in contrast to its performance with diffusion-type spread. The insufficient fit to infection data can be detected in the early stages of a shock-wave propagation and can be used as an early warning sign, providing valuable time for a planned healthcare response. Our analysis of COVID-19 infections in the US reveals that simultaneous waves due to super-spreader events in one country (India) can lead to simultaneous waves in other places. The US wave in the summer of 2021 does not fit a diffusion pattern either. We postulate that international travels from India may have caused this wave. To support that hypothesis, we demonstrate that countries with a high Indian diaspora exhibit infection growth soon after India's second wave, compared to countries with a low Indian diaspora. Based on our data analysis, we provide concrete policy recommendations at various stages of a simultaneous wave, including how to avoid it, how to detect it quickly after a potential super-spreader event occurs, and how to proactively contain its spread.

Indexed as

COVID-19EpidemicsHumansSARS-CoV-2TravelUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36202867
PMCPMC9537162
OpenAlexW4302293917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.