Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36202836›Full record

ReviewNPJ microgravity2022

Optic nerve sheath diameter and spaceflight: defining shortcomings and future directions.

Dylan A Fall, Andrew G Lee, Eric M Bershad, Larry A Kramer, Thomas H Mader, Jonathan B Clark, Mohammad I Hirzallah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ microgravity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of head-down tilt on optic nerve sheath diameter in healthy subjects.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dylan A FallBaylor College of Medicine and The Center for Space Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1485-036X
Andrew G LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Eric M BershadBaylor College of Medicine and The Center for Space Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4091-2031
Larry A KramerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1450-9479
Thomas H MaderUS Army, Moab, UT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3956-8934
Jonathan B ClarkBaylor College of Medicine and The Center for Space Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1162-1238
Mohammad I HirzallahBaylor College of Medicine and The Center for Space Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. mohammad.hirzallah@bcm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0542-8025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuro-ocular changes during long-duration space flight are known as spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS). The ability to detect, monitor, and prevent SANS is a priority of current space medicine research efforts. Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement has been used both terrestrially and in microgravity as a proxy for measurements of elevated intracranial pressure. ONSD shows promise as a potential method of identifying and quantitating neuro-ocular changes during space flight. This review examines 13 studies measuring ONSD and its relationship to microgravity exposure or ground-based analogs, including head-down tilt, dry immersion, or animal models. The goal of this correspondence is to describe heterogeneity in the use of ONSD in the current SANS literature and make recommendations to reduce heterogeneity in future studies through standardization of imaging modalities, measurement techniques, and other aspects of study design.

Identifiers

PMID36202836
PMCPMC9537149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.