Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36202592›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of cardiology2022

One-Year Prospective Follow-up of Women With INOCA and MINOCA at a Canadian Women's Heart Centre.

Mahraz Parvand, Lily Cai, Siavash Ghadiri, Karin H Humphries, Andrew Starovoytov, Patrick Daniele, Natasha Prodan-Bhalla, Tara L Sedlak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Societal, occupational, and economic considerations for women with (M)INOCA: a narrative review.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Evaluating Ischemic Heart Disease in Women: Focus on Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (ANOCA).Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mahraz ParvandVancouver General Hospital Department of Cardiology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Lily CaiVancouver General Hospital Department of Cardiology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Siavash GhadiriVancouver General Hospital Department of Cardiology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Karin H HumphriesUniversity of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Andrew StarovoytovVancouver General Hospital Department of Cardiology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Patrick DanieleUniversity of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Natasha Prodan-BhallaBritish Columbia Women's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Tara L SedlakVancouver General Hospital Department of Cardiology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Women's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: Tara.Sedlak@vch.ca.
University of British Columbia · CAB.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany women with cardiac chest pain and ischemia or myocardial infarction have no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA or MINOCA). Studies suggest that these patients have a decreased quality of life and are at increased risk of cardiovascular events. Our study reports 1-year quality of life, frequency of angina, and outcomes following entry into a multidisciplinary Women's Heart Centre (WHC).

methodsPatients with INOCA and MINOCA completed questionnaires on baseline demographics and clinical presentation. At 1-year, frequency of chest pain, quality of life, depression and anxiety symptoms, and cardiovascular outcomes were reported and compared with baseline.

resultsA total of 154 women with nonobstructive coronary artery disease were included in this study (112 patients with INOCA and 42 with MINOCA). Median age was 59 years, and the most common referral was for chest pain (94% in INOCA and 66% in MINOCA). At baseline, 64% of patients with INOCA and 43% of patients with MINOCA did not have specific diagnoses. Following investigations in the WHC, 71.4% of patients with INOCA established a new or a changed diagnosis (most common was coronary microvascular dysfunction at 68%), whereas 60% of patients with MINOCA established new or changed diagnoses (the most common of which was coronary vasospasm at 60%). At 1-year, participants had significantly decreased chest pain, improved quality of life, and improved mental health.

conclusionsA multidisciplinary WHC significantly increases the yield of a specific diagnosis in patients with INOCA and MINOCA. Further, attending a WHC could significantly improve the clinical and psychological outcomes of women with INOCA and MINOCA.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCanadaChest PainCoronary AngiographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedMINOCAProspective StudiesQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID36202592
OpenAlexW4295066026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.