ArticleThe Canadian journal of cardiology2022
One-Year Prospective Follow-up of Women With INOCA and MINOCA at a Canadian Women's Heart Centre.
Article in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Symptom experience of women with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease: A mixed-methods approach.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Societal, occupational, and economic considerations for women with (M)INOCA: a narrative review.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2025Review
- Tailored treatment of specific diagnosis improves symptoms and quality of life in patients with myocardial Ischemia and Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A nomogram to distinguish noncardiac chest pain based on cardiopulmonary exercise testing in cardiology clinic.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Unveiling the Longitudinal Journey: 3-Year Follow-up of Women with MINOCA and INOCA in a Specialized Heart Centre.CJC open · 2024Article
- Bridging the Gender Gap in Cardiovascular Medicine: Addressing Drug Intolerances and Personalized Care for Women with Angina/Ischemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Evaluating Ischemic Heart Disease in Women: Focus on Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (ANOCA).Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Review
- Sex-specific and ethnicity-specific differences in MINOCA.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024Review
- Living with myocardial ischaemia and no obstructive coronary arteries: a qualitative study.Open heart · 2024Article
- Review
- Review
- Sex, Gender, and Women's Heart Health: How Women's Heart Programs Address the Knowledge Gap.CJC open · 2024Review
- A life-course approach to tackling noncommunicable diseases in women.Nature medicine · 2024Review
- Path Less Traveled: Providing Optimal Patient Care on the Road of Diagnostic Uncertainty.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2023Article
- INOCA and MINOCA: Are Women's Heart Centres the Answer to Understanding and Management of These Increasing Populations of Women (and Men)?The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany women with cardiac chest pain and ischemia or myocardial infarction have no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA or MINOCA). Studies suggest that these patients have a decreased quality of life and are at increased risk of cardiovascular events. Our study reports 1-year quality of life, frequency of angina, and outcomes following entry into a multidisciplinary Women's Heart Centre (WHC).
methodsPatients with INOCA and MINOCA completed questionnaires on baseline demographics and clinical presentation. At 1-year, frequency of chest pain, quality of life, depression and anxiety symptoms, and cardiovascular outcomes were reported and compared with baseline.
resultsA total of 154 women with nonobstructive coronary artery disease were included in this study (112 patients with INOCA and 42 with MINOCA). Median age was 59 years, and the most common referral was for chest pain (94% in INOCA and 66% in MINOCA). At baseline, 64% of patients with INOCA and 43% of patients with MINOCA did not have specific diagnoses. Following investigations in the WHC, 71.4% of patients with INOCA established a new or a changed diagnosis (most common was coronary microvascular dysfunction at 68%), whereas 60% of patients with MINOCA established new or changed diagnoses (the most common of which was coronary vasospasm at 60%). At 1-year, participants had significantly decreased chest pain, improved quality of life, and improved mental health.
conclusionsA multidisciplinary WHC significantly increases the yield of a specific diagnosis in patients with INOCA and MINOCA. Further, attending a WHC could significantly improve the clinical and psychological outcomes of women with INOCA and MINOCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.