Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36202548›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2022

Volumetric Brain MRI Study in Fetuses with Intrauterine Growth Restriction Using a Semiautomated Method.

R Peretz, T Halevy, M Gafner, S Fried, Y Revesz, A Mayer, E Katorza

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

R PeretzFrom the Sackler School of Medicine (R.P., M.G., S.F., Y.R., A.M., E.K.), Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel reutperetz1@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3839-8101
T HalevySheba Medical Center (T.H., Y.R.), Tel-Hashomer, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8831-7285
M GafnerFrom the Sackler School of Medicine (R.P., M.G., S.F., Y.R., A.M., E.K.), Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3851-7334
S FriedFrom the Sackler School of Medicine (R.P., M.G., S.F., Y.R., A.M., E.K.), Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1306-222X
Y ReveszFrom the Sackler School of Medicine (R.P., M.G., S.F., Y.R., A.M., E.K.), Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-9324-364X
A MayerFrom the Sackler School of Medicine (R.P., M.G., S.F., Y.R., A.M., E.K.), Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-3702-1764
E KatorzaFrom the Sackler School of Medicine (R.P., M.G., S.F., Y.R., A.M., E.K.), Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-4225-7421
Tel Aviv University · ILSheba Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAccording to the medical literature, it is known that intrauterine growth restriction is associated with abnormal fetal brain findings. The aim of this study was to assess the volume of fetal brain structures in fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction compared with the control group and to examine the effect of intrauterine growth restriction on birth weight in relation to the effect on the volumes of these structures. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis historical cohort study included 26 fetuses diagnosed with intrauterine growth restriction due to placental insufficiency. The control group included 66 fetuses with MR imaging scans demonstrating normal brain structures. The volumes of the supratentorial brain, left and right hemispheres, and the cerebellum were measured using a semiautomatic method. In addition, the cerebellum and supratentorial brain ratio was calculated. The measurements of each brain structure were then converted to percentiles according to growth curves.

resultsThe absolute volumes and percentiles of all brain structures examined were smaller in the intrauterine growth restriction group. All examined brain structures showed results that were statistically significant (

conclusionsIntrauterine growth restriction affects the volume of brain structures, as measured by quantitative MR imaging. Compared with healthy controls, the effect on birth weight was more prominent than the effect on brain structures, possibly due to the "brain-preserving" capability.

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationPlacentaBirth WeightBrainCohort StudiesFemaleFetusGestational AgeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPregnancyUltrasonography, Prenatal

Identifiers

PMID36202548
PMCPMC9731260
OpenAlexW4302424841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.